Come on, even an Iowa fan knows that Kane and Ejim were the heart and soul of that team.
Seemingly never ending Iowa MBB thread (still going.....)
- Thread starter BeachAve
- Start date
- Status
Come on, even an Iowa fan knows that Kane and Ejim were the heart and soul of that team.
What I meant was, let's wait until JorBo's career is over, and then compare. Not fair to him right now, as he may turn into another John Stockton.
The closest he will be to Monte is this year. Fran's erosion of players spirit and confidence will wear out whatever thimble of talent Bohanon has by the middle of his junior year.
Now, that's a damn lie. He couldn't defend a rolling chair, though.
Hey it's Johnny Dognuts!! Glad you're off suicide watch and able to post again. Are all of the Hawk trolls going to come back out of your trailer?
This wasn't a serious post right?
You realize that Bohannon was put in that position because of Fran's inability to recruit a true quality PG, right? The only reason he got to those kind of figures was that he had to play close to 30 minutes per game because of no backup.
He was the 3rd leading scorer and top assist player for Iowa because he had to be., He was a starter most of the season. Monte started less than 1/2 of the games as a freshman, and played behind an-American PG. Often he played the 2, or even the 3. Bohannon has 151 assist so far...tops on the team...next closest was Jok with 78. Monte had 134 with fewer minutes per game at the point. He was 2nd on that team...behind Kane's 213. Niang also had 123. Monte was 6th on the team in scoring.....behind 4 players who averaged in double digits. Bohannon had to score, getting the 2nd most playing minutes per game on that team. Monte got the 5th most playing minutes for ISU that year. Monte shattered the NCAA record for A/TO ratio with a ratio of 4.78/1. Bohannon's was 2.1/1. Do you really not see the difference between these 2 players? They played in completely different circumstances.
For Bohannon's sake....I hope Fran can find someone else to play PG (and I bet Bohannon does too). He is a natural 2, and that is where his best future lies.
Question for Hawk fans here, no trolling, honest discussion: would you rather be in the PIG or be a #1 seed in the NIT?
There is only one answer, and it is the same as your answer would be for ISU. It is always better to be in the NCAA over the NIT.
Even if you lose the play in game and don't actually get in the tournament?
I'm so confused. Some ISU fans say there are 6 Big12 teams in, some say 5 Big12 teams are in.
I think the ones saying 6 got in assume Kansas State will win. I'm saying 5 for now with a potential for 6
So is the Big12 good if K State makes the NCAA and is bad if K State doesn't even
Make the Nit?
Play in game should be the answer for anybody with a brain.
Only getting 50% of a conference into the NCAA isn't that great. The BigTen isn't good and even they did that.
I think they are in, but I'm not a Big12 expert like you guys, so if you say K State is out they are out.
Iowa is 10 pts/game better next year without Jok. I learnt it over on HokNation as fans were giving Pete well wishes.
- Status