Seemingly never ending Iowa MBB thread (still going.....)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You left out the fact that Big 10 offenses are so bad that they inflate the defensive stats. They got exposed in the bowl games. Horrible conference. But this is a basketball thread, and as it turns out, the Big 10 is a horrible conference in basketball as well. I guess it just sucks to be the Big 10.
Well if we are going by your theory, then Big 12 offenses are "so elite" because the Big 12 defenses are so bad.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: isu2014
The Big Ten as a whole generally plays in more bowl games and against better competition than the Big 12 in those bowl games, therefore inflating those stats.

That's like your opinion man. Big 10 offenses are horrible, didn't even think anyone would debate that
 
That's like your opinion man. Big 10 offenses are horrible, didn't even think anyone would debate that
Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.

Big Ten played: Boston College, Washington State, Utah, Pittsburgh, Florida State, Florida, USC, Western Michigan, Clemson, Tennessee

Big 12 played: Boise State, Miami, Texas A&M, Colorado, Auburn, Georgia

Big Ten played more games and against better competition as a whole, like I said.
 
Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.

Big Ten played: Boston College, Washington State, Utah, Pittsburgh, Florida State, Florida, USC, Western Michigan, Clemson, Tennessee

Big 12 played: Boise State, Miami, Texas A&M, Colorado, Auburn, Georgia

Big Ten played more games and against better competition as a whole, like I said.
You realize that the tweet used an average; thus the "per game" language, so number of Ngames is not important. And better competition? There are some pretty bad teams the Big 10 played like BC and Washington State. Big 12 played a solid group. Less chance to pad stats.
 
Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.

Big Ten played: Boston College, Washington State, Utah, Pittsburgh, Florida State, Florida, USC, Western Michigan, Clemson, Tennessee

Big 12 played: Boise State, Miami, Texas A&M, Colorado, Auburn, Georgia

Big Ten played more games and against better competition as a whole, like I said.

The Big Ten played 4 teams that weren't in the top 30 of Sagarin to inflate their PPG total. Big 12 only played 2. Mic drop
 
  • Like
Reactions: isu2014
The Big Ten played 4 teams that weren't in the top 30 of Sagarin to inflate their PPG total. Big 12 only played 2. Mic drop
200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyTwins
You realize that the tweet used an average; thus the "per game" language, so number of Ngames is not important. And better competition? There are some pretty bad teams the Big 10 played like BC and Washington State. Big 12 played a solid group. Less chance to pad stats.
Other than BC, who played Maryland.....every other team listed there is about on par or better than the teams listed for the Big 12.
 
You realize the Big 10 played 4 teams outside the top 30 and the Big 12 only played 2 right? Makes the stat even more impressive
So, the Big Ten played 6 in the top 30, including 3 in the top 10, while the Big 12 played 4, with 0 in the top 10. So, what's your point?
 
So, the Big Ten played 6 in the top 30, including 3 in the top 10, while the Big 12 played 4, with 0 in the top 10. So, what's your point?

They had more bowl games, of course they played more top 30 teams. The average opponent for the Big 10 was 25, the average for the Big 12 was 31. Don't pretend like the opponent was the reason the Big 10 defenses were so bad
 
  • Winner
Reactions: WalkingCY
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron