Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah because Big 10 offenses suck. Let's stick to the facts
Well if we are going by your theory, then Big 12 offenses are "so elite" because the Big 12 defenses are so bad.You left out the fact that Big 10 offenses are so bad that they inflate the defensive stats. They got exposed in the bowl games. Horrible conference. But this is a basketball thread, and as it turns out, the Big 10 is a horrible conference in basketball as well. I guess it just sucks to be the Big 10.
The Big Ten as a whole generally plays in more bowl games and against better competition than the Big 12 in those bowl games, therefore inflating those stats.
Well if we are going by your theory, then Big 12 offenses are "so elite" because the Big 12 defenses are so bad.
Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.That's like your opinion man. Big 10 offenses are horrible, didn't even think anyone would debate that
You realize that the tweet used an average; thus the "per game" language, so number of Ngames is not important. And better competition? There are some pretty bad teams the Big 10 played like BC and Washington State. Big 12 played a solid group. Less chance to pad stats.Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.
Big Ten played: Boston College, Washington State, Utah, Pittsburgh, Florida State, Florida, USC, Western Michigan, Clemson, Tennessee
Big 12 played: Boise State, Miami, Texas A&M, Colorado, Auburn, Georgia
Big Ten played more games and against better competition as a whole, like I said.
Not really. Big Ten played in 10 games, Big 12 played in 6 games.
Big Ten played: Boston College, Washington State, Utah, Pittsburgh, Florida State, Florida, USC, Western Michigan, Clemson, Tennessee
Big 12 played: Boise State, Miami, Texas A&M, Colorado, Auburn, Georgia
Big Ten played more games and against better competition as a whole, like I said.
The Big Ten played 4 teams that weren't in the top 30 of Sagarin to inflate their PPG total. Big 12 only played 2. Mic drop
Other than BC, who played Maryland.....every other team listed there is about on par or better than the teams listed for the Big 12.You realize that the tweet used an average; thus the "per game" language, so number of Ngames is not important. And better competition? There are some pretty bad teams the Big 10 played like BC and Washington State. Big 12 played a solid group. Less chance to pad stats.
Other than BC, who played Maryland.....every other team listed there is about on par or better than the teams listed for the Big 12.
So, the Big Ten played 6 in the top 30, including 3 in the top 10, while the Big 12 played 4, with 0 in the top 10. So, what's your point?You realize the Big 10 played 4 teams outside the top 30 and the Big 12 only played 2 right? Makes the stat even more impressive
http://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/iowa-football-recruiting.218752/So, the Big Ten played 6 in the top 30, including 3 in the top 10, while the Big 12 played 4, with 0 in the top 10. So, what's your point?
We aren't talking about Iowa football recruiting.Way too much football talk in here, there's a thread on how much Iowa football recruiting sucks if you want to go talk football in there.
Then go pick any Iowa Football threadWe aren't talking about Iowa football recruiting.
So, the Big Ten played 6 in the top 30, including 3 in the top 10, while the Big 12 played 4, with 0 in the top 10. So, what's your point?
We aren't talking about Iowa football recruiting.
Lute Olson won't be walking through the door anytime soon.
No they're not