So you want to argue that if we had made 5 of the threes that we missed we wouldn't have most likely won the game? Because I'll concede that if we had gotten 5 more stops throughout the game we probably would have won. Like I said, the outcome is most likely the same. Our results on both ends of the floor weren't outrageously out of whack from the averages for the season, so it would stand to reason a bump on either side of the ball would elicit the same outcome, right?
We gave up 60 points in a half...that's pathetic by any team's standards on the defensive end of the court.
89 points should be enough to win. Our offense was good.
If you really can't understand why people are more upset about our defense than our offense, then there is no point in arguing with you. It demonstrates that you have next to nothing for a basketball iq.