Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

Joe Wieskamp 2018

Status
Not open for further replies.
UofICy said:
From getting tons of love his Junior year to last pick in the draft...that's regression at it's finest.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight, he got a "ton of love" his Jr year, but he didnt his senior year, yet he still managed to get named to the first team All Big Ten, and get drafted? Im sorry, I dont follow. That makes zero sense.
 
Rabbuk said:
You're going to make more than 50% of dunks and 10 foot jump shots, which was AW game.
Click to expand...

I wont argue with you there, because that was his game. He created mismatches and went to the hoop. I hope you arent making that out to be a bad thing.
 
Dryburn said:
Hilarious that this thread has now gone on for 20 pages for a kid that has made a verbal commit to a school way too early to get too excited about. He may be a good player in a couple of years, but face it.....if he really is top 25 or whatever....Kentucky, UNC, Kansa, Duke, etc.... will likely come calling. Let's see what happens then.

It's just hilarious that so many hawk fans come over here trying to brag this up, yet they want to talk about ISU as being little brother. Comical.

But, I'm sure Woodbury, Mike G. and company will have no problem beating ISU this year, now that CFH is gone. After all, Fran is every bit the coach Fred is/was and Iowa has really been just as good of a team as ISU the last 5 years or so. Plus, we all know that Iowa's program has gotten just as much national attention in recent years as ISU, right?

Hell, I bet this year, Woodbury might improve so much that he will even have more blocks than Monte.......now that will put ISU in their place!
Click to expand...

Easily the greatest stat of all time when comparing ISU to little bro.
 
khawk4 said:
I wont argue with you there, because that was his game. He created mismatches and went to the hoop. I hope you arent making that out to be a bad thing.
Click to expand...
I'm not at all, I'm just thinking it's not going to translate to the NBA at all. But being 1st fiddle in a band of absolute hacks like the Hawkeyes were last year is nothing to write home about.
 
I've witnessed some of the dumbest debates in Cyfan history, but Perky and UofICy are giving them a run for their money.
 
UofICy said:
He absolutely did regress..from junior to senior year...next?
Click to expand...

You keep saying that. HOW did he regress? Just because you keep saying it, doesnt make it true. Want to look at some numbers? He improved is PPG, APG, TOPG, FG%, and 3PT% (just to name a few), all while playing four less games. Look at the numbers. Now, how in the WORLD is that regressing?

http://stats.washingtonpost.com/cbk/players.asp?id=97656
 
ISU42 said:
I've witnessed some of the dumbest debates in Cyfan history, but Perky and UofICy are giving them a run for their money.
Click to expand...

I think I can.. I think I can..
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • the-little-engine-that-could--300x246.jpg
    the-little-engine-that-could--300x246.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 205
Rabbuk said:
I'm not at all, I'm just thinking it's not going to translate to the NBA at all. But being 1st fiddle in a band of absolute hacks like the Hawkeyes were last year is nothing to write home about.
Click to expand...

Got ya. But this isnt about translation to the NBA, its about good players under Fran that didnt regress. As far as his game goes, I agree, unless he improves his shot, he's not big enough to bang, or quick enough to beat guards off the dribble. But we are talking about NBA type guys here. Still doesnt mean he wasnt a stud in college.
 
khawk4 said:
Got ya. But this isnt about translation to the NBA, its about good players under Fran that didnt regress. As far as his game goes, I agree, unless he improves his shot, he's not big enough to bang, or quick enough to beat guards off the dribble. But we are talking about NBA type guys here. Still doesnt mean he wasnt a stud in college.
Click to expand...
Who would you say was a better college player Ejim or White?
 
khawk4 said:
You keep saying that. HOW did he regress? Just because you keep saying it, doesnt make it true. Want to look at some numbers? He improved is PPG, APG, TOPG, FG%, and 3PT% (just to name a few), all while playing four less games. Look at the numbers. Now, how in the WORLD is that regressing?

http://stats.washingtonpost.com/cbk/players.asp?id=97656
Click to expand...

he went from being a possible 1st round draft pick to last pick in the draft. Maybe regression is the wrong term here. Didn't meet expectations perhaps...
 
khawk4 said:
Got ya. But this isnt about translation to the NBA, its about good players under Fran that didnt regress. As far as his game goes, I agree, unless he improves his shot, he's not big enough to bang, or quick enough to beat guards off the dribble. But we are talking about NBA type guys here. Still doesnt mean he wasnt a stud in college.
Click to expand...

He wasn't an AA.
 
khawk4 said:
What does that even mean? Last time I checked, Fran won us a tournament game, and has improved every single year. Why is is so hard for some of you to admit Iowa isnt some cellar dweller anymore? I have no problem admitting ISU is playing at a very high level right now.
Click to expand...

So 1 tourney win in how many years? good grief you guys are high
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom