Sometimes (and I am going to get flamed here) I feel like we should be dumping our resources into the "4 star" guys, you know the ones who have a chip on their shoulder, that will stay 2 years plus (Monte Morris, Georges Niang) and develop into good to great players. I would love to have a 8 man rotation of these guys, and you can win a national title doing it, especially with the transfers sprinkled in. Dirty recruiting in college basketball is the worst kept secret there is and the UNC scandal being swept under the rug, as well as the NCAA likely looking the other way with UK and Calipari, (you can't tell me he is clean after 2 schools say otherwise).
Its frustrating is all I am trying to say. Its like trying to date the hottest girl in high school, and competing with everyone else. She is likely a spoiled ***** and worthless in the sack. Now her friend who is almost as hot feels like she has to work much harder and EARN what she gets.
Well from your own post, plus throw in SDW, Custer, Naz, Ejim, MT...we generally put most of our resources towards these kinds of players. Going after a couple 5 stars over the course of 2 years isn't really draining all of your resources. Fred has said he's going after players that he wants no matter what they are rated, transfer, or JUCO.
I think a big misnomer going around is that we're "putting all of our eggs in the Diallo basket" or we "put all of our eggs in the RV basket last season" when that is not the case. There is obviously contingencies in place for everything.
When you have one of the hottest young coaches in the game (in every sense of the word. Would) why not go for a hole in one every year? It's not hampering us.