I wish this were true but the members of the committee are only human.The names don't matter one bit. The resumes are what mattered.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish this were true but the members of the committee are only human.The names don't matter one bit. The resumes are what mattered.
The names don't matter one bit. The resumes are what mattered.
The names don't matter one bit. The resumes are what mattered.
I've looked at other SOS rankings and literally the only place I've seen Ohio State ahead of TCU is on ESPN.Forget all of the talk. This is about money and ratings for ESPN. Period. Even their analysts who said that the best four teams got in and then turned right around and said how lucky Alabama is that they don't have to face TCU or Baylor! Lucky?? It is freaking rigged so that the SEC wins this thing. STFU about the non-conference for Baylor. I have not heard a peep about the three cupcakes that Alabama played...
I've looked at other SOS rankings and literally the only place I've seen Ohio State ahead of TCU is on ESPN.
Also, usually when you talk about quality wins, you look at record vs. Top 50 or Top 25. ESPN used record vs. Top 60. That's a very arbitrary number. Want to know why they went from 50 to 60? IT HELPS OHIO STATE. 3 of the teams between 51-60 are B1G teams and only one is from the Big 12. If you look at Top 50, TCU and Baylor both have better wins against good teams. But when you look at top 60, Ohio State looks better.
I've looked at other SOS rankings and literally the only place I've seen Ohio State ahead of TCU is on ESPN.
This myth that Ohio State has a better SOS than TCU is out there and I have no clue why. I follow SOS rankings all year, TCU does not have a worse schedule than Ohio State.
What real non-doctored SOS rankings look like, and have basically looked like for the past six weeks:
View attachment 30414
What real non-doctored SOS rankings look like, and have basically looked like for the past six weeks:
View attachment 30414
10 spots is pretty insignificant, IMO, when you are in the 40's all bets are off. Who cares, it was close and OSU dominated a good opponent the last game of the year. It was not a total slight that people make it out to be. Schedule someone in the non-con with a pulse and make the SOS difference undisputable. Thats the solution. Or add a title game with 10 teams. Expansion should be the last resort at this point, unless you can steal a power 5 team.
10 spots is pretty insignificant, IMO, when you are in the 40's all bets are off. Who cares, it was close and OSU dominated a good opponent the last game of the year. It was not a total slight that people make it out to be. Schedule someone in the non-con with a pulse and make the SOS difference undisputable. Thats the solution. Or add a title game with 10 teams. Expansion should be the last resort at this point, unless you can steal a power 5 team.
TCU dominated Minnesota which was a tougher opponent than anyone OSU played in the noncon.
TCU dominated Minnesota which was a tougher opponent than anyone OSU played in the noncon.
TCU had one win against a good team - K-State.
I've looked at other SOS rankings and literally the only place I've seen Ohio State ahead of TCU is on ESPN.
Also, usually when you talk about quality wins, you look at record vs. Top 50 or Top 25. ESPN used record vs. Top 60. That's a very arbitrary number. Want to know why they went from 50 to 60? IT HELPS OHIO STATE. 3 of the teams between 51-60 are B1G teams and only one is from the Big 12. If you look at Top 50, TCU and Baylor both have better wins against good teams. But when you look at top 60, Ohio State looks better.
TCU had one win against a good team - K-State.