ISU finished with 319 yards.
Weird, ESPN initially only had Richardson finishing with 52 passing yards when he had 185. Either way, I was talking about passing yards not total yards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ISU finished with 319 yards.
Weisman dive, Weisman off-tackle. Weisman draw. Rinse, repeat. If EIU did that the whole game, they'd win easily.
But they won't. So we have a chance.
Weird, ESPN initially only had Richardson finishing with 52 passing yards when he had 185. Either way, I was talking about passing yards not total yards.
How many passing yards did your idiot quarterback have? He seemed to be overthrowing everything by 10 yards.
They call them "game-managers" over in IC.
Weird, ESPN initially only had Richardson finishing with 52 passing yards when he had 185. Either way, I was talking about passing yards not total yards.
Coming from you, this actually means something. Please baby jesus let us play well this coming saturday!Ball State has the worst offense I have ever seen and I am being 100% serious.
Iowa's kicking game will cost them at least one win. Almost happened today. 3 missed field goals. Ugh. Next week looks like a complete toss up given the way each team played today.
I really don't see ISU losing at Iowa. They are pathetically bad.
How many passing yards did your idiot quarterback have? He seemed to be overthrowing everything by 10 yards.
Ball State has the worst offense I have ever seen and I am being 100% serious.
This coming from the guy who said "I think ISU's defense is going to surprise a lot of people". Keep em coming Curt. I like your predictions. They are usually wrong.
By the way Ball State won 10 games last year. I don't think they are anywhere close to being that kind of team this year, and I will not make excuses for the way Iowa performed today. That was a pathetic performance by the Iowa offense up until the last few minutes. The defense played lights out tho.
My biggest concern about Iowa is the lack of running game. That was the one aspect of the Hawks that most people thought would be a given this year, and it just hasn't been the case. When Iowa has actually spread it out they move the ball pretty efficiently (see the last 5 minutes of today's game). When they've tried to establish the running game it had been pretty ugly. I'm not sure the constant rotation at RB is a good thing. Personally, I think they should stick with Canzeri and Daniels. They just bring more to the table than Weisman and Bullock.
With that said, I was fully expecting Iowa to lose today and they pulled away with the W so I'll take it. They didn't deserve to win. I'm hoping it was a wake up call because if not I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised to see a loss to the Cyclones next weekend.
I have no problem eating some crow by the way. I didn't expect ISU to even compete today. When I saw the score at halftime I had to rub my eyes and double check a couple times. No points in the 2nd half hurt big time. Seems like there must be a struggle with consistency on offense? I didn't get to watch so I don't know. Either way, ISU must have played much better than i expected them to. I'm not near as comfortable about next week as I was yesterday.
Why did you just say this........now you jinxed it.
Also, it doesn't matter, history tells us it will be 50/50
This coming from the guy who said "I think ISU's defense is going to surprise a lot of people". Keep em coming Curt. I like your predictions. They are usually wrong.
By the way Ball State won 10 games last year. I don't think they are anywhere close to being that kind of team this year, and I will not make excuses for the way Iowa performed today. That was a pathetic performance by the Iowa offense up until the last few minutes. The defense played lights out tho.
My biggest concern about Iowa is the lack of running game. That was the one aspect of the Hawks that most people thought would be a given this year, and it just hasn't been the case. When Iowa has actually spread it out they move the ball pretty efficiently (see the last 5 minutes of today's game). When they've tried to establish the running game it had been pretty ugly. I'm not sure the constant rotation at RB is a good thing. Personally, I think they should stick with Canzeri and Daniels. They just bring more to the table than Weisman and Bullock.
With that said, I was fully expecting Iowa to lose today and they pulled away with the W so I'll take it. They didn't deserve to win. I'm hoping it was a wake up call because if not I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised to see a loss to the Cyclones next weekend.
I have no problem eating some crow by the way. I didn't expect ISU to even compete today. When I saw the score at halftime I had to rub my eyes and double check a couple times. No points in the 2nd half hurt big time. Seems like there must be a struggle with consistency on offense? I didn't get to watch so I don't know. Either way, ISU must have played much better than i expected them to. I'm not near as comfortable about next week as I was yesterday.
Iowa's defense is still pretty good. Ball states only td came on a fumble return.
This coming from the guy who said "I think ISU's defense is going to surprise a lot of people". Keep em coming Curt. I like your predictions. They are usually wrong.
By the way Ball State won 10 games last year. I don't think they are anywhere close to being that kind of team this year, and I will not make excuses for the way Iowa performed today. That was a pathetic performance by the Iowa offense up until the last few minutes. The defense played lights out tho.
My biggest concern about Iowa is the lack of running game. That was the one aspect of the Hawks that most people thought would be a given this year, and it just hasn't been the case. When Iowa has actually spread it out they move the ball pretty efficiently (see the last 5 minutes of today's game). When they've tried to establish the running game it had been pretty ugly. I'm not sure the constant rotation at RB is a good thing. Personally, I think they should stick with Canzeri and Daniels. They just bring more to the table than Weisman and Bullock.
With that said, I was fully expecting Iowa to lose today and they pulled away with the W so I'll take it. They didn't deserve to win. I'm hoping it was a wake up call because if not I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised to see a loss to the Cyclones next weekend.
I have no problem eating some crow by the way. I didn't expect ISU to even compete today. When I saw the score at halftime I had to rub my eyes and double check a couple times. No points in the 2nd half hurt big time. Seems like there must be a struggle with consistency on offense? I didn't get to watch so I don't know. Either way, ISU must have played much better than i expected them to. I'm not near as comfortable about next week as I was yesterday.