..and she made the call to meet.
And there were texts prior to the call between them right? But they couldn't be used as evidence in Bubu's favor because she was drunk.
Correct me if I'm wrong here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
..and she made the call to meet.
This would be one thing if it was truly controversial. The thing is everyone outside of the school (they deal with these things regularly) has either found him innocent (or not guilty).Wow state, that is a classic blame the accuser mentality. Sorry, that is how I read the post. (My apologies if I am wrong)
There are so many shades of grey and so many points of misinformation on either side of this issue.
Let me start by saying I have my opinions but do not know what really happened and nor what the full truth is. At this point very few do and they may not agree!.
I have challenges with those on either end of the spectrum:
-Free Bubu, Leath is wrong.
-Hang Bubu high.
However, the biggest challenge I have on this forum on the those who are not open to listening to the each other, and above all the massive level of ignorance on legal issues and university policy issues.
From my personal experience I only know 2 things for certain.
1. Something happened that evening.
2. Leath and Pollard (who have seen things none of us will likley see about this) are comfortable in their decisions. They can sleep at night feeling they feel they made a right decision (I am speaking of how they feel personally.)
Was the decision right or wrong? Personally I have know way of answering that. However, I do feel those that throw either side under the bus should just step back and see what happens as this now plays out.
Just my thoughts.
This would be one thing if it was truly controversial. The thing is everyone outside of the school (they deal with these things regularly) has either found him innocent (or not guilty).
I feel like there is overwhelming evidence to say he is innocent. It's also better to side on the basis of innocence. It's much worse to have innocent people mistakenly convicted than to have guilty people go free. Those guilty people will get what they deserve at some point.
I would have no argument with that recommendation.
However, that assumes full cognitive abilities.
I am guessing this could be murky as well.
Again, I cannot in good conscience give make I final conclusion where I stand on this.
I have opinions, but I would be a fool if I said I had enough information to determine innocence or guilt.
Honest question: If a man and a woman are each drunk, and have relations, what happens if there is a question whether it was consensual? Can either claim they were forced into it, or is it assumed men can only have sex if they consent?
The timing of the student policy decision causes a lot of consternation when he had all summer and made his pivotal move only one week after the deadline. Smells fishy. Maybe the threats of suing by Mom happened just after the deadline for the scholly to be revoked on purpose. After all, Bubu played an awful lot of ball the season before after the transgression with the approval of Jamie, Fred, and Leath. I tend to think the accuser and not Leath picked the timetable to drop the hammer, knowing what would happen. The fallout from student policy is a story by itself. Other similar situations did not invoke student policy. Why let him keep the scholly in any case if the student policy had been broken for such a serious offense. One thing mentioned little is potential for Bubu to be marked for life as a sex offender. This is serious stuff.This should be the answer, and then the whole thing dies off.
Instead, we have presidential conspiracies and people crying about a scholarship taken away from the team.
The timing of the student policy decision causes a lot of consternation when he had all summer and made his pivotal move only one week after the deadline. Smells fishy. Maybe the threats of suing by Mom happened just after the deadline for the scholly to be revoked on purpose. After all, Bubu played an awful lot of ball the season before after the transgression with the approval of Jamie, Fred, and Leath. I tend to think the accuser and not Leath picked the timetable to drop the hammer, knowing what would happen. The fallout from student policy is a story by itself. Other similar situations did not invoke student policy. Why let him keep the scholly in any case if the student policy had been broken for such a serious offense. One thing mentioned little is potential for Bubu to be marked for life as a sex offender. This is serious stuff.
As Shakespeare wrote, something smells rotten in the state of Denmark.
Except that it's been well reported that this delay never happened. All parties agreed ahead of time to wait until a scheduled trip to Africa was completed. That's not some purposeful "screw the basketball program" delay. It's a weak argument at best.
The university's number one priority is to its students. If a student files a complaint of sexual misconduct, it's up to the university to try to provide a safe environment and prevent future sexual harassment, assault, or rape. These decisions are not completely about convicting and punishing somebody (we have a legal system for that). I'm not saying it's a great system, but it's the reality that universities face today and whether the purported misconduct was between two members of the university makes a huge difference. I will say I find Leath's decision very bizarre to deem Bubu could remain a student but not participate in sports.
This. How did he make ISU and the girl safer by only removing him from the bb team?
The timing of the student policy decision causes a lot of consternation when he had all summer and made his pivotal move only one week after the deadline. Smells fishy. Maybe the threats of suing by Mom happened just after the deadline for the scholly to be revoked on purpose. After all, Bubu played an awful lot of ball the season before after the transgression with the approval of Jamie, Fred, and Leath. I tend to think the accuser and not Leath picked the timetable to drop the hammer, knowing what would happen. The fallout from student policy is a story by itself. Other similar situations did not invoke student policy. Why let him keep the scholly in any case if the student policy had been broken for such a serious offense. One thing mentioned little is potential for Bubu to be marked for life as a sex offender. This is serious stuff.
As Shakespeare wrote, something smells rotten in the state of Denmark.
If you weren't surprised that Leath would reverse the ALJ decision and boot BuBu after he had played the last half of his junior year, you should have warned BuBu so he could have transferred and also told Fred so he could have got another scholarship player he could actually play.
pretty sure everyone stopped caring on here, till this happened.
Never mind the fact this girl lied, they have also had relations in the past, and Bubus name has always been upstanding prior. I guess it's just easier to blame the man for your regrets.
Yup. It never happens that men rape women the have relations with before. Never.
I think a lot of people are overlooking the fact that just Bubu picking a girl up with another guy and those two people hypothetically having consensual sex with that girl and that getting out to the media is enough of a "bad look" for the university that the AD and President would want to distance themselves from that player.
Add on top of that the girl accuses him of rape, and (innocent or not) the best thing for PR is to distance yourself as much as you can.