As I mentioned in a different thread, I couldn't watch the game, only did online tracking — so I can't judge which is a better decision. Fouling obviously seems like a good idea in retrospect.
But was the game truly lost at that point?
Some have made reference to Lucious missing front-end (even though he made 2 FTs after that).
ISU also had a 6-point lead under 3 minutes, and Ejim missed a 3-pointer. I defer to anyone who saw the game, was that a good shot within that context? This isn't a swipe at Melvin — I just don't know the circumstances with that. My main point: Plenty of details could have made strategy in the final seconds moot.
But was the game truly lost at that point?
Some have made reference to Lucious missing front-end (even though he made 2 FTs after that).
ISU also had a 6-point lead under 3 minutes, and Ejim missed a 3-pointer. I defer to anyone who saw the game, was that a good shot within that context? This isn't a swipe at Melvin — I just don't know the circumstances with that. My main point: Plenty of details could have made strategy in the final seconds moot.