***Official Other Bubble Teams Thread***

I think Texas, KSU, and ISU all end up in the tournament.

Wow, six in from a 10 team Big 12 would be quite a coup considering how much the Big 12 has been bad mouthed by the media this year. I'm not saying you are wrong, but I would be clicking my heels if our conference got 5 in.
 
I'm with you. I know it was just local media, but this morning on the news, they were talking of Northwestern being a good shot at the tournament this year as well as Illinois, but they are slipping. I don't understand the B1G bias that gets thrown around during tournament time. These teams both have bad losses this year, not just to who they lost, but when they played the big boys, they got spanked. I'm not wanting to argue which conference is better, I don't follow it close enough for that, but these are teams that have proven they can't play with the top teams. ISU may have lost some games, but we've kept them close.

Again, probably just local media hype.

The thing is overall the Big 10 is pretty good. They have a lot of teams that a better than average like Illinois, NW, Purdue and Minn. I'm not saying they are great teams, but they have much better resumes then OU, OSU, and ATM. So when those teams beat up on each other, the get quality wins out of them.

For example, Minnesota's conference wins are over Indiana (RPI=16) , Penn St (137), NW (36), Ill (42), & Neb (111). So they have 1 really good win and two solid wins. Sound familiar? We have KU (5) and then K-State (48) and Texas (53). Now I think we all would agree that we are better than Minn, but our resumes are similar. The difference is their wins over mid to lower level Big 10 teams looks better than our wins over mid to lower level Big 12 teams.
 
The thing is overall the Big 10 is pretty good. They have a lot of teams that a better than average like Illinois, NW, Purdue and Minn. I'm not saying they are great teams, but they have much better resumes then OU, OSU, and ATM. So when those teams beat up on each other, the get quality wins out of them.

For example, Minnesota's conference wins are over Indiana (RPI=16) , Penn St (137), NW (36), Ill (42), & Neb (111). So they have 1 really good win and two solid wins. Sound familiar? We have KU (5) and then K-State (48) and Texas (53). Now I think we all would agree that we are better than Minn, but our resumes are similar. The difference is their wins over mid to lower level Big 10 teams looks better than our wins over mid to lower level Big 12 teams.

That's an important detail to consider. It's easy to overlook if you give it a surface-analysis. Also annoying when it's the case in "someone else's conference," and even more so when Iowa State could be battling for a spot vs. those same teams. However, actual criteria for inclusion, while certainly debatable, is what matters.

The final five at-large bids tend to come down to about a dozen contenders. Those teams frequently have a flawed, unimpressive body of work.
 
The thing is overall the Big 10 is pretty good. They have a lot of teams that a better than average like Illinois, NW, Purdue and Minn. I'm not saying they are great teams, but they have much better resumes then OU, OSU, and ATM. So when those teams beat up on each other, the get quality wins out of them.

For example, Minnesota's conference wins are over Indiana (RPI=16) , Penn St (137), NW (36), Ill (42), & Neb (111). So they have 1 really good win and two solid wins. Sound familiar? We have KU (5) and then K-State (48) and Texas (53). Now I think we all would agree that we are better than Minn, but our resumes are similar. The difference is their wins over mid to lower level Big 10 teams looks better than our wins over mid to lower level Big 12 teams.

The bottom line for Minnesota is based on their remaining schedule I don't see too many wins in their near future. They also have 2 incredibly HORRIBLE losses to an Iowa team that ISU dominated. If it came down to ISU or Minnesota I think the committee is picking the Clones.
 
Are chances of making the tournament are getting worse each day

3stooges_face_palm.jpg
 
Hahahaah Nice. If we beat TAMU, our chances of making it stay alive. If we lose, hello NIT

This is also false. It would hurt our chances, no doubt. But we still have 2 games against Baylor, and games against KSU and Mizzou. Losing to ATM would hurt, but by no means kill our tourney chances. We still have lots of chances for really good wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone
This is also false. It would hurt our chances, no doubt. But we still have 2 games against Baylor, and games against KSU and Mizzou. Losing to ATM would hurt, but by no means kill our tourney chances. We still have lots of chances for really good wins.
This. Losing tomorrow would hurt, but all it would mean is we would need to pick up an upset on the road some where.
 
This is also false. It would hurt our chances, no doubt. But we still have 2 games against Baylor, and games against KSU and Mizzou. Losing to ATM would hurt, but by no means kill our tourney chances. We still have lots of chances for really good wins.

Exactly. It's as if some people on here have already penciled losses in for the K-State road game, the 2 games against Baylor, and the road game against Mizzou. I don't get it. Maybe some fans missed the Mizzou game when they were only ahead of the Clones by 3 points with 30 seconds left in that game.... Or they missed the Kansas game in Lawrence in which ISU led for 75% of that game and by double digits most of the time, or they missed the Kansas game in Ames when ISU beat the Jayhawks, etc....

I think this team has shown they have the ability to play with the best teams in the Big XII. Only a fool would count them out in any game they have remaining on the schedule.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron