Sagarin ratings for last 5 yrs
ISU 2011- 2nd Iowa-48th
ISU 2010- 24th Iowa-49th
ISU 2009- 71st Iowa-41st
ISU 2008- 51st Iowa-63rd
ISU 2007- 20th Iowa-75th
Avg..........33.6...........55.2
Not top 20 year to year, but with the new Big 12 schedule it sure seems like that will be the case. 3 out of the last 5 yrs are top 25 schedules though.
Take out this year even, and ISU is still an AVG of 15 spots tougher in the schedule. The reality is, year to year, the Big ten is a weaker conference than the Big 12. It is much easier to get bowl eligible and occasionally have a great season in the Big 10 because the competition is worse and Iowa normally plays teams like Southeastern Louisiana Poly Tech A&M State.
I have respect for the way Kirk has been able to keep his coaches around for so long, because he is loyal to them and they are loyal to him. I do think he is WAY over-payed for the results on the field. Anytime he wins more than 7 games he gets an extension and a raise. That is why there is no chance in hell he leaves Iowa for the Chiefs or anywhere else. Nobody gets rewarded more for doing less in this profession.
2010 and 2009... compare them all you want, but Iowa gets knocked down because they play ISU and ISU gets knocked up because they play Iowa. So the reality is, you can't take those for what they say all the time. Don't act like you can automatically compare the two because they all play different non-conference schedule. Iowa beat the hell out of ISU 2 years in a row and ISU benefited in SOS because of Iowa's record. Please.
That is exactly why you can't take all that stuff into account. Records, SOS....none of that matter. Head to head matters. If ISU beats Iowa, they are better, when Iowa beats ISU, Iowa is better. Easy as pie.