What is so hard to understand about the fact that Iowa made 21 of 58 shots, Creighton made 32 of 58. That right there is the difference in the game. Iowa lost by 23 and this is a 24 point difference. As Creighton made 2 more three's = 6 points and 9 more two's = 18 points.
If Creighton misses just 5 more shots and Iowa makes 5 more layups they missed this is a totally different game.
Again, not many if any teams will win shooting 35% while their opponent shoots 55%.
This is the funniest thing I've ever read. If it wasn't so long I'd put it as my signature. Don't you think defense has something to do with that? And doesn't defense have to do with talent? And don't talented players get better looks which in turn makes their percentage go up? It all comes down to who is the better team and who has more talent. Creighton in a landslide.
What you don't understand is that Iowa shoots 35% from the field a lot. B/c they aren't athletic and teams defend them very easy. The Creighton game was the norm for Iowa