I thought this whole deal was done last night. Liars I tells ya.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glad A&M is gone. I'd like to see the conference stay at nine teams (ISU plays 8 conference games and 4 non conference). Maybe the conference could look to add teams in when Tier 1 rights are up. JMHO.
How do you know the Big 12 isn't recruiting new teams? A sportswriter tweeted last night that such talks were going on.
If the okie schools go to the PAC, do we hope UT and TT go their own way and we invite the BE to join us? We would be up to 14 teams and be the same size as PAC and most likely sec. If we can work the tv contracts right, we might be able to hold teams over ACC.
We stick it to those leaving, 25-30 million exit fee, as per contract and land nicely. Remember we only made in the 8 area last year. Not that I don't want to improve, I definitely don't want to go backwards.
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I came across a great podcast today on ESPN. Mike Tirico asks some good, well-thought out realignment questions to a Big East former commissioner, Nebraska's Chancellor and Joe Schad.....
Open Mike with Mike Tirico: 9/14 - ESPN
So why did UNL admins consistently voted for unequal revenue sharing if they didn't like it? Please explain that conundrum to me. Their excuses for joining the B1G are just political spin (aka bold-faced lies). UNL and UT were at war with on another from day one of the Big12 and UNL lost, so they went to the B1G to apply a salve to their damaged egos, and placate donors and fans. I believe the reasons for the move are that simple and anything else offered as an explanation is just spin.Um, Remember when the B12 formed? UNL said the same things then as they did last year, that the revenue sharing was whack. They didn't like it then, and they didn't like it last year either. CU left mainly from the timing, but the imbalance of $ was a main factor in all of this; do you think CU would of left on its own merits?
PS; the main reason UT is trying to hold this conference together is because no other conference will allow the unequal revenue sharing they enjoy. LHN is gone if they go B10 or Pac12.
Double PS: If you are reading this as some kind of sympathy for UNL, you are sorely mistaken...
Not necessarily. I do not think that is a done deal by any stretch of the imagination unless the PAC 12 prezes say so. Pac 12 does not need them with OU. We will see.OSU is going with OU aren't they?
That is what class manipulators/PR gurus/southern wheeler dealers do for a living. The flim flam man was from down south wasn't he?Instead of believing what the NU schills and Berry Tramel tell you, look at the facts and make your own decision. It doesn't matter what OU, TAMU, or NU say, it matters what they did and are doing, and in revenue sharing matters, OU, TAMU and NU voted with UT, because they wanted to get exactly what UT got. Also, the facts indicate that TAMU has been trying to divorce itself from UT long before the creation of the Big 12.
It's extremely difficult for me to understand how a rational person can look at the hypocricy and complacency in the voting patterns of OU, TAMU, and NU in Big 12 policy matters, and the motivations of TAMU, OU, CU, and NU, and somehow lay the entire blame on UT. But if it makes you feel better for some reason, go right on ahead.
Lou Holtz says ISU, Big 12 will be fine | Des Moines Register Staff Blogs
If Lou Holtz says it...it has to be true.
FYI this is from Sept. 2nd.
Lou Holtz says ISU, Big 12 will be fine | Des Moines Register Staff Blogs
If Lou Holtz says it...it has to be true.
FYI this is from Sept. 2nd.
Those rats abandoning ship should have to pay that back (bad faith acceptance) as they were going to sneak away with the money anyway.They recently voted to share Tier 2 money equally. And Texas is now publicly stating they want Tier 1 shared as well. This puts the onus on OU who is saying now that they want revenues split equally and is one of the reasons they give for going to the Pac-??.
Nebraska and aTm are on record as well saying the reasons for leaving the conference are because they want equal sharing of revenue.
Yet they have consistently voted against equal revenue sharing.
So as he said, look at their actions. Their previous actions do not back up their words they express today.
And remember that aTm was the one that took the Forgotten Five's share of Exit fees from kNu and the Buffs.
At a speaking engagement on Monday, Southeastern Conference Commissioner Mike Slive re-emphasized the league's desire for Texas A&M to become its 13th member. You can read Commissioner Slive’s statement at:
Commissioner Slive Talks Conference Alignment > SEC > NEWS.
Please be assured that Texas A&M remains highly attractive to the SEC in both athletics and academics, which tied together embody the Aggie Spirit, and that we are working diligently to iron out the details of our future inclusion in the conference.
Chris can you close this thread too, this seems like a bunch of unreliable information????? The instability is killing me, I am going to close my eyes to this for the rest of the week....:twitcy:
Chris can you close this thread too, this seems like a bunch of unreliable information????? The instability is killing me, I am going to close my eyes to this for the rest of the week....:twitcy: