*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait, so the "big news" this guy was holding was the NCAA investigation of Miami? What was his "source", the morning edition of SportsCenter? Further proof (as if we needed any) that Bleacher Report is a ******* joke.
 
Right. Cal already threatened to block Baylor because of their Baptist ties, I don't see any way in hell they wouldn't do the same for a Mormon school.

I've seen other posters state similar things about Cal vetoing BYU membership. We're talking about Cal Berkley right? Can someone fill me in on the background here? TIA
 
Dont see it happening but there is some thought this would be the new conference formed by Texas/ND/OU

5VLTh.gif

So, OU, OSU, KU and MU would give up its long time history with ISU and the over 1.5 million TV sets it delivers to add Cinncinnati who might not even be able to deliver its own market? I don't buy it.
 
I've seen other posters state similar things about Cal vetoing BYU membership. We're talking about Cal Berkley right? Can someone fill me in on the background here? TIA

I hadn't heard Cal specifically, but this article that came out around the last round of realignment indicates the following reasons that BYU wouldn't be invited to the Pac 12:

- The secular institutions in the Pac-10 are wary of aligning with a church-affiliated school
- BYU isn't viewed as a good fit academically because it's not a major research institution
- For religious reasons, the Cougars don't play on Sundays, which restricts scheduling options.
- It makes no sense for the Pac-10 to invite two schools (Utah and Brigham Young) from the same television market.
 
I've seen other posters state similar things about Cal vetoing BYU membership. We're talking about Cal Berkley right? Can someone fill me in on the background here? TIA

Haven't heard anything specifically about BYU, but Chip Brown tweeted that Cal-Berkley was blocking the addition of Baylor with the other 3 texas schools to the Pac-10 last summer. Never heard any official source on that though as the Texas thing never actually came to fruition.

Twitter
 
Dont see it happening but there is some thought this would be the new conference formed by Texas/ND/OU

5VLTh.gif

IF the Big 12 dies, which I think is unlikely at this point, this is far, far from the conference that Texas and ND would form. Why would Texas and ND pool most of their games/revenue with the likes of the service academies, Cincy, Tech etc.

IF Texas and ND form a conference it will be elite, those are the two biggest programs in college football. And it will be small, because there are few who are even close to equal with those two.

Notre Dame
Texas
Miami
Oklahoma
USC
Biggest 6th they can pull.

That's the conference that makes sense for Notre Dame and the Longhorn Network both.

Conference Evolved: The Six Team All-Kings Conference - Black Heart Gold Pants
 
I have a new conference idea The Mid Atlantic eastern coast conference, or the MAECC. When the **** hits the fan The remaining Big twelve Big East and ACC combine forces!!! Insert sarcasm pirate.
 
I've seen other posters state similar things about Cal vetoing BYU membership. We're talking about Cal Berkley right? Can someone fill me in on the background here? TIA
Cal Berkley is the center for atheists vs BYU Mormons: salt and pepper.
 
I would think that the major programs (Texas, OU, ND, etc.) would have to realize the value of not being in a conference where every team they play is a superpower. If they were, even the best team would likely have a couple of losses. It doesn't make sense. Teams like ISU, MU, KSU, KU, Tech, Baylor, etc. have value in that it allows the superpowers to stay superpowers. In most years, Texas/OU/ND will beat those teams.

Winning = $ and that has to play a part in conference realignment.
 
IF the Big 12 dies, which I think is unlikely at this point, this is far, far from the conference that Texas and ND would form. Why would Texas and ND pool most of their games/revenue with the likes of the service academies, Cincy, Tech etc.

IF Texas and ND form a conference it will be elite, those are the two biggest programs in college football. And it will be small, because there are few who are even close to equal with those two.

Notre Dame
Texas
Miami
Oklahoma
USC
Biggest 6th they can pull.

That's the conference that makes sense for Notre Dame and the Longhorn Network both.

Conference Evolved: The Six Team All-Kings Conference - Black Heart Gold Pants

Actually, this scenario makes absolutely NO sense - you think any of those "elite" teams are going to settle for finishing last when all of them have more than a puncher's chance at finishing first in their current conferences in any given year? Finishing first earns you much more coin than finishing last.
 
I would think that the major programs (Texas, OU, ND, etc.) would have to realize the value of not being in a conference where every team they play is a superpower. If they were, even the best team would likely have a couple of losses. It doesn't make sense. Teams like ISU, MU, KSU, KU, Tech, Baylor, etc. have value in that it allows the superpowers to stay superpowers. In most years, Texas/OU/ND will beat those teams.

Winning = $ and that has to play a part in conference realignment.

When you are in a 6 team conference you have 7 non-con games to schedule yourself wins. And when you are in a 6 team conference with a BCS a****id, as any conference with Texas/ND/Miami/OK would have, then your road to the BCS isn't any more difficult than any of the 12 team conferences with championship games.

If you think what is driving college football is scheduling more wins, how have you made sense of any of the past year and half? The Big Ten didn't invite Nebraska to up the win count for the rest of its members...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron