BHAHAHA! Upgrade over Croyle?? Paaaalease. Stanzi would be lucky to be an upgrade over Banks with the Barnstormers, which is probably 2 years away.Yup, many of them consider him to be an upgrade over Croyle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BHAHAHA! Upgrade over Croyle?? Paaaalease. Stanzi would be lucky to be an upgrade over Banks with the Barnstormers, which is probably 2 years away.Yup, many of them consider him to be an upgrade over Croyle.
Was this thread about other positions? It was about Stanzi and the QB position.
I wish him good luck.
For everyone bashing Stanzi, saying he won't make it in the NFL, you are definitely in the minority. Even Mike Mayock on NFL Network, when recapping the draft the Chiefs had, said Stanzi gives them "their quarterback of the future." Kiper also thought Stanzi was a 2nd round talent. I would say these two men know a little bit more about NFL talent than anyone on this message board.
For everyone bashing Stanzi, saying he won't make it in the NFL, you are definitely in the minority. Even Mike Mayock on NFL Network, when recapping the draft the Chiefs had, said Stanzi gives them "their quarterback of the future." Kiper also thought Stanzi was a 2nd round talent. I would say these two men know a little bit more about NFL talent than anyone on this message board.
I remember cyclone fans on here (a very large majority) saying that Stanzi couldn't even hold AA's jockstrap. They said the two were not even close talent wise.
IMO- They are similar in ability and it is very hard to compare. AA would do much, much better in a Pro Set in which he handed the ball off 60% of the time and had time to throw. Stanzi would not look good in a zone read. AA was rarely healthy due to the pounding he took in the zone read. Stanzi had the same simple offense to learn. AA had 4 offenses to learn.
I thought AA looked like an NFL caliber QB when he was playing for McFarland. Not so much with Herman.
IMO- They are similar in ability and it is very hard to compare. AA would do much, much better in a Pro Set in which he handed the ball off 60% of the time and had time to throw. Stanzi would not look good in a zone read. AA was rarely healthy due to the pounding he took in the zone read. Stanzi had the same simple offense to learn. AA had 4 offenses to learn.
I thought AA looked like an NFL caliber QB when he was playing for McFarland. Not so much with Herman.
IMO- They are similar in ability and it is very hard to compare. AA would do much, much better in a Pro Set in which he handed the ball off 60% of the time and had time to throw. Stanzi would not look good in a zone read. AA was rarely healthy due to the pounding he took in the zone read. Stanzi had the same simple offense to learn. AA had 4 offenses to learn.
I thought AA looked like an NFL caliber QB when he was playing for McFarland. Not so much with Herman.
IMO- They are similar in ability and it is very hard to compare. AA would do much, much better in a Pro Set in which he handed the ball off 60% of the time and had time to throw. Stanzi would not look good in a zone read. AA was rarely healthy due to the pounding he took in the zone read. Stanzi had the same simple offense to learn. AA had 4 offenses to learn.
I thought AA looked like an NFL caliber QB when he was playing for McFarland. Not so much with Herman.
Didn't ISU run the ball just as much as Iowa did last year? Isn't one of the benefits of being in the shotgun that it often gives the QBs more time since they do not have to drop back and can identify the defense quicker? Isn't ISUs spread offense built to distribute the ball quickly on crossing and in/out routes?
Sorry, but there is not a single person that is not a cyclone fan that would agree with your assessment.
Your post reels of ignorance.Just stop. One is going to the NFL and the other is bartending.
IMO- They are similar in ability and it is very hard to compare. AA would do much, much better in a Pro Set in which he handed the ball off 60% of the time and had time to throw. Stanzi would not look good in a zone read. AA was rarely healthy due to the pounding he took in the zone read. Stanzi had the same simple offense to learn. AA had 4 offenses to learn.
I thought AA looked like an NFL caliber QB when he was playing for McFarland. Not so much with Herman.
Just stop. One is going to the NFL and the other is bartending.
A 5th rounder doesn't automatically secure a spot...numbn$tts.
Iowa has good drafts over the years, but has sucked at producing QB's for the NFL--- the worst run in the Big 10 the last 50 years. It's not even close.
Heck Iowa State's two 'clipboard' carriers (as Hawk fans like to describe them) have been cashing an NFL paycheck for 10+ years non-stop. Even a 3rd ISU qb guy--Todd doxon, made the Miami Dolphin roster for a short while in the mid 90's.
Scott Mullin (much more highly regarded out of high school than Rosenfels), Tate, Reiner, Brad Banks, Kyle McCann---would give their left nut to SNIFF an NFL paycheck
I would never diss a Hawkeye of earning a living in the NFL......yet Iowa fans still try to diss Seneca and Sage.
whatever......TavernHawks
Your post reels of ignorance.
Its not my fault Arnaud is bartending in Ames and Stanzi is a Kansas City Chief. Arnaud has more upside though, right??? You cyclone fans are great.
The irony here is pretty great. I kid Taz, I kid.
Are you going to pretend that you know the answer to your own question? Serious question.Do you think Stanzi will be cashing NFL paychecks as long as Sage and Seneca have? Serious question.
Arnaud was the unfortunate victim of having to go through 3 different coaching staffs in his stay here. He never really had the chance to get settled into a system.