The willingness for ISU fans to settle for mediocrity amazes me sometimes - and it astounds me further as to why the same ISU fans ***** and moan about how the national media never respects us.
Were Morgan's years better than McDermott's? Certainly - and I'm not arguing that. Although I define NIT appearances and bubble seeds as mediocrity, it certainly is better than what we have now. I just refuse to allow McDermott's failures here to warp my view that Morgan's 3 years here were anything but mediocre, especially when during Morgan's tenure we weren't so far removed from back-to-back 2-seeds (arguably deserving 1-seeds both years) and had come to EXPECT quality basketball.
Honestly, I think it's the pining for mediocre basketball that disturbs me most about the "Morgan was fired unjustly" circle...
So just out of curiousity, what are your expectations for ISU basketball if you consider a season in which we beat the #2 team in the nation on the road and won a game in the NCAA tournament to be mediocre?
Also, you seem to be conveniently forgetting that LE had the opportunity to sustain our success after the #2 seed seasons for two seasons afterward and failed miserably at that task. It's unfair to hold WM accountable for not sustaining that level of success when his first two seasons were much better then LE's last two seasons. And again, I am very curious to know what your expectations for ISU basketball are if you consider an NCAA at-large invitation and conference road wins to be mediocre.