Wayne Morgan to Iowa?

Are you happy 85? Your thread is now a ******* match. =)
 
And we barely beat a very overrated Minnesota team to get there...

115562673_03b7fceea6.jpg
I know, but hey at least during those days, you thought you had a chance to win games!
 
When you are as hopelessly bad as Iowa was this year, a different direction is a good direction. It was a failed model, with little to no returning talent ot get better with. A change in philosophy, and a chance in personnel can't hurt at that point, and as such, yes I think they are in going in the right direction.

In my opinion, I would rather by taking a chance than lying stagnant like I feel we are.

Very good point, and I agree - at this point McDermott is in lame duck status and we're just hoping to catch lightning in a bottle.
 
It's amazing what some people will nitpick and argue about on here.
 
In the 3 previous matchups of Wayne's "athletes" vs. Greg's "clodhoppers", here's how Wayne fared:

1) won by 3
2) lost by 17
3) won by 7

Yeah, those are some real poundings Wayne dished out. :confused:
True, but Wayne was never a great x's and o's coach. If the new guy @ Iowa is good with X's and O's, Wayne can definitely bring in the talent and the Hawks could be on the rise real fast.
 
Ugh. Iowa would have an assistant who did a better job coaching Iowa State than our current head coach. Inferiorating.

Happy for Wayne though if he wants to get back into coaching.
 
Well, if these "athletes" are anything like Mike Evanovich, Ross Marsden, or Aaron Agnew, or hell, even Shawn Taggert, I think we'll be OK. And yes, I am saying Shawn Taggert was not a great athlete.

He was a good basketball player though. Unless you think being the 6th man on a runner-up Nat'l team and then starting for a very good team the next season means he sucks.
 
When you are as hopelessly bad as Iowa was this year, a different direction is a good direction. It was a failed model, with little to no returning talent ot get better with. A change in philosophy, and a chance in personnel can't hurt at that point, and as such, yes I think they are in going in the right direction.

In my opinion, I would rather by taking a chance than lying stagnant like I feel we are.

I can certainly respect this opinion, and I think many other Cyclone fans would agree with you. There have been many cases where this worked wonderfully, and just as many where it blew up in a school's face.

I really hope McDermott can get this thing turned around, and I think Pollard believes he will. If the time ever comes where Pollard doesn't believe that, then GMac will be out the door, buyout be damned.
 
No. He wasn't great. The fact that I am seeing "excellent" recruiter and WM in the same sentence really, really baffles me. He brought in some solid guys, like all coaches do, but certainly wasn't a 5 star recruiter.

His first team, which won 20 games (which, IMO, was disappointing considering the makeup of that team) played 4 significant players that Wayne didn't recruit; Homan, Vroman, Sullivan, and Jefferson. (And people can talk about Will and Curt all they want; fact is, Larry does deserve some of that credit. It's part of being the head coach, sealing the deal. He drove out to the east coast to watch Curtis play. Curtis was quoted saying this meant a lot to him.)

His second team was fun to watch when, and only when, they kicked it in the a$$ and went on a hot streak.

His 3rd team blew. I care more about what's in my turds than that team cared about Iowa State basketball.

And no, Taggart was NEVER great, and certainly never lived up to the hype. He put up solid numbers for a LOADED Memphis team. He didn't have to hustle or play defense. Great guards got him the ball in easy places.

That team seemed to care more about ISU basketball than Gmac's recent teams. I don't recall any starters on that tream transferring, especially in the middle of the season.

Curtis Stinson played as hard for ISU as anyone in recent history. Not always smart, but he wanted to win and play hard. Hey, in that year you think nobody cared, the Big 12 coaches voted Stinson to the All Big 12 defensive team.
 
When you are as hopelessly bad as Iowa was this year, a different direction is a good direction. It was a failed model, with little to no returning talent ot get better with. A change in philosophy, and a chance in personnel can't hurt at that point, and as such, yes I think they are in going in the right direction.
So all that little returning talent is now going to perform better with a new system? Probably not, but perhaps in the future.
I bet the records after Fran's first two years is similar to Lick's. Well his model deemed a failure as well?

In my opinion, I would rather by taking a chance than lying stagnant like I feel we are.
It would have been much more efficient, with less baseless and inconsistent (if not illogical) statements by just starting off with this...rather than making poor attempts to relate every random college basketball situation to being better than ISU's.
 
I know, but hey at least during those days, you thought you had a chance to win games!

:rolleyes:

The willingness for ISU fans to settle for mediocrity amazes me sometimes - and it astounds me further as to why the same ISU fans ***** and moan about how the national media never respects us.

Were Morgan's years better than McDermott's? Certainly - and I'm not arguing that. Although I define NIT appearances and bubble seeds as mediocrity, it certainly is better than what we have now. I just refuse to allow McDermott's failures here to warp my view that Morgan's 3 years here were anything but mediocre, especially when during Morgan's tenure we weren't so far removed from back-to-back 2-seeds (arguably deserving 1-seeds both years) and had come to EXPECT quality basketball.

Honestly, I think it's the pining for mediocre basketball that disturbs me most about the "Morgan was fired unjustly" circle...
 
What record?
You would actually base the decision of three games over three years? Of course not. But hey, any attempt to bash ISU athletics, even if illogical, is worth it.

I'll answer it for you: Jamie made a huge mistake firing Wayne, and his entire staff / uprooting the families, basically without cause.

If Jamie thought there were any deficiencies on Wayne's part, he should have done the right thing any normal/ good boss would have done - outline the problem areas and give the man a chance to work it out in a reasonable time frame.

Everybody complains about BVD not giving LE a second chance, Jamie screwed the pooch by pulling the trigger way too soon on WM, then went into contract negotiations with GM from a poor platform that resulted in the current state of the program.
 
And we barely beat a very overrated Minnesota team to get there...

115562673_03b7fceea6.jpg

We beat a solid Minnesota team by 12 I think. Oh my god, the Wayne haters have been relegated to bashing an NCAA Tourney win!

After the past 4 years, it is surreal (and ridiculous) reading a Cyclone fan complain about a team that went to the 2nd round of the NCAA Tournament. Seriously, WTF? :no:
 
So all that little returning talent is now going to perform better with a new system? Probably not, but perhaps in the future.
I bet the records after Fran's first two years is similar to Lick's. Well his model deemed a failure as well?


It would have been much more efficient, with less baseless and inconsistent (if not illogical) statements by just starting off with this...rather than making poor attempts to relate every random college basketball situation to being better than ISU's.

I guess I'm not sure which baseless and illogical statements I made, other than that, in my opinion, Wayne Morgan is now sitting on the bench of a program that has committed themselves to moving in a new direction, whereas we seem to be pounding our head against the wall, waiting for a losing formula to win.

Again, just my opinion...nothing empirical. I figured opinion is what these message boards survive on...
 
We beat a solid Minnesota team by 12 I think. Oh my god, the Wayne haters have been relegated to bashing an NCAA Tourney win!

After the past 4 years, it is surreal (and ridiculous) reading a Cyclone fan complain about a team that went to the 2nd round of the NCAA Tournament. Seriously, WTF? :no:

Why is it in your world such an injustice to want and expect BETTER than Wayne Morgan?

(and no, I don't consider McDermott better than Morgan)
 
I'll answer it for you: Jamie made a huge mistake firing Wayne, and his entire staff / uprooting the families, basically without cause.

If Jamie thought there were any deficiencies on Wayne's part, he should have done the right thing any normal/ good boss would have done - outline the problem areas and give the man a chance to work it out in a reasonable time frame.

Everybody complains about BVD not giving LE a second chance, Jamie screwed the pooch by pulling the trigger way too soon on WM, then went into contract negotiations with GM from a poor platform that resulted in the current state of the program.

I agree and disagree:
Wayne needed to go.
GMac's contract is brutal.
 
It's amazing what some people will nitpick and argue about on here.

Yes, people are whining about Wayne because he barely won an NCAA Tourney game (I thought it was 64-52 actually or something like that). Surreal considering where our program has gone since he was fired.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron