You question is which team runs a mesh point QB read offense designed to freeze the D at the snap, with zone blocking...um about 80% of teams in college football. Albeit some are more zone read run based like Oregon, and others are more RPO based like Okie State. And they all do it to varying tempos.
If you want me to single out 1 team, I'd say Toledo. Last year their playbook on RPOs was handoff or deep pass. Their 2 outside WR's, Cody Thompson, and Jon'Vea Johnson, each averaged 19 yards per catch and were 9th and 15th respectively in the country in ypc. They also had Kareem Hunt at RB and their h-back was drafted in the 4th round, so that helped free up those WR's.
You say schemes don't matter and it's all execution. While execution is certainly important, you overlook the fact that defenses see certain things 80% of the time, and thus 100% of defenses are built to stop what the see 80% of the time. 4-2-5 defenses with 210 pound LB's...a disadvantaged program like ISU would probably be better off running power-i than mesh point QB read. Cram it down these small defenses. I still advocate the K-State offense. Either way I want to see a lot less zone blocking and much more pull guards (like on the LanRam package)...get our big power resources to the point of attack. Our OL isn't talented enough to zone block.
But if scheme doesn't matter, explain to me why disadvantaged programs like K-State, Stanford, and Georgia Tech appear in the top 25 in offensive efficiency rankings every year. Because they run a unique offense that defenses don't see, don't recruit to stop, and don't know how to handle. If you want to win at a program like ISU, don't do what Oklahoma and Texas do.
