Indiana is like Kansas. Nobody really cares about football. Plus, they have Notre Dame and Purdue in their state. And they are fairly close to Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could have said the same thing about Nebraska at the end of the Tom Osborne era, but look where they are now.I don’t know about this. Iowa has a pretty easy formula working for them. There will always be crazy brainwashing in state, and as long as Illinois sucks (along with their entire division), it will be hard to mess it up.
Before the emergence of the P2 I would've agreed with you. But now the NIL + transfer element coupled with giant TV money makes NO JOBS in the B1G the worst job...with the right boosters...except maybe UNL because of their ridiculous expectations and lack of self awareness.Rutgers, MD, and Indy are all in the same boat imo. They will NEVER get to the CCG. Never.
Before the emergence of the P2 I would've agreed with you. But now the NIL + transfer element coupled with giant TV money makes NO JOBS in the B1G the worst job...with the right boosters...except maybe UNL because of their ridiculous expectations and lack of self awareness.
That's an interesting point, and once they do away with divisions, I think you can add Illinois, Nebraska, Minnesota, Purdue and Northwestern to that list. Iowa would avoid the list only because some years their schedule will be playing those 8 weakest teams.Rutgers, MD, and Indy are all in the same boat imo. They will NEVER get to the CCG. Never.
Yeah if you are going to use that qualifier it is actually a completely different question. NW is great to be a coach at because they are very loyal to coaches and don't expect greatness but they will never win consistently. NW and Indiana are the two that would be the hardest to get consistent winning seasons but they aren't bad to coach at the way it is at Nebraska.The OP said: let's define worst as the place it would be most difficult to win at consistently.
For that reason I said Northwestern. They are in a city where no one cares about them. Their stadium is a joke (they do have an upgrade planned).
They are darn lucky to have Pat Fitz, but even he has struggled to win consistently.
Rutgers and Indiana make a strong case as well.
Based on the OP, I don't see the answer as Nebraska. With the facilities and fan support they have, it shouldn't be difficult to win there consistently. Pelini had no problem winning consistently.
Being a bad job due to unreal expectations is a different poll/discussion.
Yeah, I made it sound like you could just throw money at RU football and win, which Texas proves every year is false. But I stand by my initial statement simply because Greg Schiano 1.0 could've done it, imo...I feel like there’s a tipping point between coaching salaries and the will to win. What that number is? I don’t know. At some point coaching with no chance of winning becomes a pit of apathy. I think that is going to be an interesting thing in 5-10 years. Those fan bases are already accustomed to losing, but they still are probably rabid and want to see results and are hopeful. I think that will change over time, those fans go away or become “we have more money!” fans, they don’t care about coaches producing results, so they don’t care if the coaches don’t care.
and Iowa fans do care....their admin at least has that going for them...the same can't be said for a school like IllinoisI don’t know about this. Iowa has a pretty easy formula working for them. There will always be crazy brainwashing in state, and as long as Illinois sucks (along with their entire division), it will be hard to mess it up.
Did I see what I thought I saw - last Saturday, the IL game was on TV and there were many more empty seats than filled - surprising and sad ??Nebraska is the popular choice, and probably for good reason. I don’t think Rutgers is that bad because do they really care?? I don’t know.
I voted Illinois simply because I don’t understand how they are absolute garbage every year. I know they have basketball fans and have had success there, but football is awful. They remind me of a less basketball successful Kansas.
Fitz has worked miracles and while the admissions requirements are tough for Northwestern, at least they're close to a major city.Northwestern because the student athletes have to actually be good students. What Fitzgerald has done there is unbelievable. Besides Barnett having limited success in the mid 90s, Northwestern has been the laughingstock of BIg 10 football
Illinois fans just don't care about footballDid I see what I thought I saw - last Saturday, the IL game was on TV and there were many more empty seats than filled - surprising and sad ??