That's my thought. Every team (outside 2 teams, OSU & MSU as my previous post) is basically the same: 2-3 good players with no one else you have to worry about. Easy from a match-up standpoint.
Iowa State would match up very well with teams in the B1G. Look at Kansas, not overly athletic outside 2 positions, we just match up well against that and struggle against tall athletic teams (Baylor, Okie St.) which you don't see much of in the B1G. I don't think there's any arguing that.
And Michigan, I guess. ISU didn't seem to match up well with them.
that didn't take you long to stink up the place.....you are the resident troll.
Right on Palmer! That troll is a ****!
Wait...
so far you can use it... but lets see if that translates in to March Madness success... .the Big 12 has seen success in the post season from the RPI.. but we will see on the RPI for the B1G.
B1G is good... just not #1 good.
-keep
Yup, I agree, may not turn out that way. But right now, they're rated number 1 using the criteria that lots of posters on here used to show how tough the Big12 was in football. I just find it funny (and ironic) that as Iowa looks good, that all of the sudden means the Big Ten sucks.
Some people's kids. For sure.