Will the BIG10 Reverse Their Decision?

This part makes no sense, ANYTHING that causes the heart to work harder? Exercise causes the heart to work harder, is that causing inflammation every time?
“One thing that was consistent was anything that caused the heart to work harder caused heart inflammation.”

you can’t even comprehend your own writing.


It’s very apparent that you are the type that likes to play technicalities and latch onto anything that might give you a glimmer when you realize the other person may have a valid point. You are the type that when someone says that on June 1st that it is a nice summer day that you want to say no it’s spring so you are wrong buddy.

You want to think that “anything” meant exercise in my statement to make yourself feel better and give yourself a win, so be it. I focus on information, not finding a way to make myself always be right.
 
Wow have I been in the unknown about all of this due to storm cleanup. So basically the Big Ten has a bunch of egg on its face despite being called "the superior conference" from our friends to the east. Couldn't have happened to a better group.
 
I'm a firm believer in the virus but also believe the Big Ten did not make their decision solely on the virus like they are claiming. But thanks for calling me an idiot. Maybe ask how I came to my decision before name-calling.

That would be reasonable but all @alarson did was rate your post dumb after calling you an idiot and others morons. If you don't walk lockstep with him all he has is call you names and rate posts dumb.
 

This is no longer Dan Rather's CBS. It's become tabloid 'opinions' to ignite a click campaign. While evidence is still being used it, like most other tabloid media these days, 'pits' two differing opinions in an argumentative manner to solicit conflict. "Reporting" the news, sadly, is no longer. "Opinionated" narrative is the master of clicks.
 
This is no longer Dan Rather's CBS. It's become tabloid 'opinions' to ignite a click campaign. While evidence is still being used it, like most other tabloid media these days, 'pits' two differing opinions in an argumentative manner to solicit conflict. "Reporting" the news, sadly, is no longer. "Opinionated" narrative is the master of clicks.

Exactly. What an absurd title to an article.
 
This is no longer Dan Rather's CBS. It's become tabloid 'opinions' to ignite a click campaign. While evidence is still being used it, like most other tabloid media these days, 'pits' two differing opinions in an argumentative manner to solicit conflict. "Reporting" the news, sadly, is no longer. "Opinionated" narrative is the master of clicks.

Is CBS supposed to pretend that three P5 conferences are playing and two P5 conferences are not playing? Is that not because of a difference of opinion?
 
Is CBS supposed to pretend that three P5 conferences are playing and two P5 conferences are not playing? Is that not because of a difference of opinion?
The title, by itself, is wrought with nothing more than conflict. Along with not making any sense whatsoever. But, hey, if you can translate it into something that makes sense to you, fine by me.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron