we have two high quality losses
- Thread starter cycloneML
- Start date
then the big 12 isnt very good, because they will finish in the upper 1/3 of it all.
No they won't. They'll finish in the middle 1/3 of it all. And you're right, the Big 12 isn't very good, and neither is K-State.
Won't happen this year, unless you count KU/CU as high quality wins, and even those aren't a given, especially CU seeings as how its on the road.
KSU is a bowl team. 7-5 regular season. They're already 4-0, and they will beat KU and colorado and probably a couple more.
We are just below that. And with our schedule, we'll end up 5-7.
We are just below that. And with our schedule, we'll end up 5-7.
They did, UCLA also got beat by Stanford 35-0. Comparing scores doesnt work. :spinny:
k-state should have lost to UCF? Maybe.
But they didn't. They should have lost to us too, right? But they didn't
They're 4-0. And will win 3 more. They beat A&M last year by 50
But they didn't. They should have lost to us too, right? But they didn't
They're 4-0. And will win 3 more. They beat A&M last year by 50
good point. UCF looked way more prepared for Daniel Thomas than we did. When they stopped that horse, KSU's coffman started to throw and find the open guys. He looked serviceable in the 4th quarter and actually led them to the win. it wasnt pretty, but they win.
We'll see what K-State is made of in two weeks when Nebraska goes to Manhattan. I see the Huskers putting a beatdown on them
I fail to see a bright spot in your incessant rambling....Those games are still losses, one of which, the Kansas State game, has slightly crippled our postseason chances....