Timeouts

I gotta quit coming on here after a loss. This place is ridiculous after a loss.

Fred used and needed every one of the three timeouts he had left in the second half and still people are ******** about it. When someone gets trapped on the corner or can't get the ball in and ISU doesn't have a timeout to use will you all be happy?

I agree. Also, will everyone on this board who has totally mastered their job in less than 3 years please post how they accomplished that feat.

Fred's opponents probalby average 10X more coaching experience and 5X more head coaching experience.

Stay reasonable my friends.
 
I'm amazed at the number of people posting on this board, who are smarter and would make a better coach than Fred Hoiberg. :jimlad:
 
I gotta quit coming on here after a loss. This place is ridiculous after a loss.

Fred used and needed every one of the three timeouts he had left in the second half and still people are ******** about it. When someone gets trapped on the corner or can't get the ball in and ISU doesn't have a timeout to use will you all be happy?


Running out of timeouts means that you need to call more timeouts, plain and simple.

ISU used 2 timeouts in the first half, and used all three (3) of their remaining timeouts in THE LAST 12 SECONDS of the game. That means ISU went 19 minutes and 48 seconds in the second half of a back and forth game without calling a single timeout.

ISU had the ball with 1 minute and 45 second left, up 3 points. Lucious turns the ball over with about 10 seconds left on the shot clock. Kabongo then throws up a 3 point shot very fast and misses, ISU gets the ball back, again up 3, with about 90 seconds left. No timeout called again, Fred lets them play. Safe to say if ISU scores on this play, it would be mighty hard for Texas to win it. If you can be up two possession with about 45 seconds left that is typically the case. So call a timeout, set up a play. Instead, we let the guys play, ISU completly milks the clock down, cant get anything going (again, no timeout is called at all during this possession), and Babb launches up a 3 as the shot clock is winding down, misses. Texas gets the rebound, drives to half court and calls a timeout. Barnes draws up a great play, Kabongo drives the lane and gets an easy layup. Texas immediately calls another timeout to draw up a defense. Clyburn gets fouled, makes both, ISU up by 3. Fred then finally calls a timeout to discuss if they should foul or not, and we all know what happens after that.

Point is, had ISU called a timeout earlier, and set up a decent play, especially in that possession that they couldn't get anything going and Babb threw up a 3 with 45 seconds left, we could of been up 5 points instead of 3, and you don't need to use the timeouts at the end of the game to discuss weather you should foul or not.
 
ISU used 2 timeouts in the first half, and used all three (3) of their remaining timeouts in THE LAST 12 SECONDS of the game. That means ISU went 19 minutes and 48 seconds in the second half of a back and forth game without calling a single timeout.

ISU had the ball with 1 minute and 45 second left, up 3 points. Lucious turns the ball over with about 10 seconds left on the shot clock. Kabongo then throws up a 3 point shot very fast and misses, ISU gets the ball back, again up 3, with about 90 seconds left. No timeout called again, Fred lets them play. Safe to say if ISU scores on this play, it would be mighty hard for Texas to win it. If you can be up two possession with about 45 seconds left that is typically the case. So call a timeout, set up a play. Instead, we let the guys play, ISU completly milks the clock down, cant get anything going (again, no timeout is called at all during this possession), and Babb launches up a 3 as the shot clock is winding down, misses. Texas gets the rebound, drives to half court and calls a timeout. Barnes draws up a great play, Kabongo drives the lane and gets an easy layup. Texas immediately calls another timeout to draw up a defense. Clyburn gets fouled, makes both, ISU up by 3. Fred then finally calls a timeout to discuss if they should foul or not, and we all know what happens after that.

Point is, had ISU called a timeout earlier, and set up a decent play, especially in that possession that they couldn't get anything going and Babb threw up a 3 with 45 seconds left, we could of been up 5 points instead of 3, and you don't need to use the timeouts at the end of the game to discuss weather you should foul or not.

Or they could have been still up by 3 and no longer had the timeout they needed and used at the end of regulation.

Too many people on this board make so many assumptions. Calling a timeout results in an automatic made basket, fouling at the end of a game means that the other team will never get the ball back and a another chance to score, ISU going to the line is an automatic 2 points. Coaching would be a lot easier if those were true, but they aren't.
 
Last edited:
I'm amazed at the number of people posting on this board, who are smarter and would make a better coach than Fred Hoiberg. :jimlad:

Did not even stay at a Holiday Inn last night and I would have guarded the inbounding 3 point shooter. But guess I guess it worked out better Fred's way.
 
Or they could have been still up by 3 and no longer had the timeout they needed and used at the end of regulation.

Too many people on this board make so many assumptions. Calling a timeout results in an automatic made basket, fouling at the end of a game means that the other team will never get the ball back and a another chance to score, ISU going to the line is an automatic 2 points. Coaching would be a lot easier if those were true, but they aren't.

Fred has proven that one of his strongest areas of coaching is drawing up plays, and ISU is typically awesome in his tenure at scoring out of timeouts. I feel that he should take advantage of that more then he does.
 
Last edited:
If we won, his timeout usage was just fine.
Since we lost, it stinks.
It's a simple story to tell.

Disagree. I was complaining about Fred usage of timeouts at the ends of the WVU and KSU games in Ames.

The KSU game Fred called only 2 timeouts the entire game, and one came right after Niang put up a 3 to put ISU ahead.

Fred Also let ISU play through WVU's barrage of 3 pointers in that game in Ames. He finally called a timeout when WVU was within 3. That one really drove me crazy.
 
Last edited:
I think this is fair to debate. People get all butt hurt whenever someone criticizes Fred.
 
I think this is fair to debate. People get all butt hurt whenever someone criticizes Fred.

In a vacuum, sure this might be a legitimate debate, but it starts to **** people off when we see one or more of these threads (I'm just talking about the timeout threads, not all the other "Fred can't coach threads") after every single game. Enough already! We get it, you want the Scott Drew method of calling timeouts. There are other opinions on the matter that are just as legitimate.
 
ISU used 2 timeouts in the first half, and used all three (3) of their remaining timeouts in THE LAST 12 SECONDS of the game. That means ISU went 19 minutes and 48 seconds in the second half of a back and forth game without calling a single timeout.

ISU had the ball with 1 minute and 45 second left, up 3 points. Lucious turns the ball over with about 10 seconds left on the shot clock. Kabongo then throws up a 3 point shot very fast and misses, ISU gets the ball back, again up 3, with about 90 seconds left. No timeout called again, Fred lets them play. Safe to say if ISU scores on this play, it would be mighty hard for Texas to win it. If you can be up two possession with about 45 seconds left that is typically the case. So call a timeout, set up a play. Instead, we let the guys play, ISU completly milks the clock down, cant get anything going (again, no timeout is called at all during this possession), and Babb launches up a 3 as the shot clock is winding down, misses. Texas gets the rebound, drives to half court and calls a timeout. Barnes draws up a great play, Kabongo drives the lane and gets an easy layup. Texas immediately calls another timeout to draw up a defense. Clyburn gets fouled, makes both, ISU up by 3. Fred then finally calls a timeout to discuss if they should foul or not, and we all know what happens after that.

Point is, had ISU called a timeout earlier, and set up a decent play, especially in that possession that they couldn't get anything going and Babb threw up a 3 with 45 seconds left, we could of been up 5 points instead of 3, and you don't need to use the timeouts at the end of the game to discuss weather you should foul or not.

chuck is spot on. Fred is very conservative with his use of timeouts. He claims he wants his team to work through tough moments, fine, but after 3 games of poor late execution, you need to try something different.

A missed shot with 22 seconds left is worse than one with 15 seconds left. See Texas game. So even if ISU misses, they run more clock.
 
You know, I have been critical of Coach Hoiberg at times but you can't point the finger at him for the Texas loss. I thought he executed game plans well, however, our man to man defense was horendous!! The 2-3 zone was much more effective.

Getting back to calling time-outs, I thought Coach Hoiberg made good decisions when to call timeouts, and when not to. You can arm-chair quarterback this game till the cows come home.

Bottom line. Coach Hoiberg is a good coach!
 
To recap:

2nd half:
2:05 left, Ejim layup ISU 67-62
1:47 left, layup UT, ISU 67-64
1:22 left, turnover Lucious
1:19 left, ISU defensive rebound
:43 left, missed 3 by Babb, UT rebound
:32 left, UT timeout
:19 left, layup UT, ISU 67-66
:19 left, timeout UT
:11 left, foul UT, Clyburn makes both 69-66
:11 left, timeout ISU
:07 left, foul Palo, UT makes both 69-68
:05 left, foul UT, Lucious make both, 71-68
:05 left, timeout ISU
:04 left, timeout UT
:01 left, 3 made by UT, 71-71
:01 timeout ISU

1st OT:
We trail, 73-71 at 4:37
We tie it at 4:22
We trail 76-73 at 3:28
We trail 76-74 at 3:02
We trail 79-74 at 2:28
We trail 79-77 at 2:16
We tie it at 79 at 1:21
Ejim misses a layup at :23
Texas calls the first timeout of the overtime at :08
1st OT expires on Ejim rebound

2nd OT:
We're up 81-79 at 4:12
Tied at 81 at 3:50
Down 83-81 at 2:24
Up 84-83 at 1:49
Down 85-84 at 1:16
Up 86-85 at 1:00
Down 87-86 at :45
ISU timeout at :36
Turnover by Clyburn at :32, Clyburn foul at :31
2 FT's by UT at :31, down 89-86
ISU timeout at :10 after offensive rebound
Missed 3 by McGee
Turnover - Game

So, who the hells knows. The bottom line is that Fred let's the guys play and SHOOT. SO DID Barnes. Fred trusts in our offense to keep space and get someone a decent look. It worked many times late in the game and OT's. At times it didn't. There was plenty of substitutions by Fred to have the right guys on the floor as well. Go to CBSSports.com and find the tracker. There is plenty of coaching going on. Even Barnes let his guys make plays, Kabongo and McClellan took some big shots for them. As did the guys on our team you want to take shots. When you are in such a tight game and still making plays I would argue let them play. There were TO's called though. I would also argue that plays are called in advance of situations. Like during UT's called timeouts. Ugh, enough said.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron