Oh please. :skeptical:
I love how you guys just pull numbers out of your @#!@##$.
No one on this board knows the sentiments of the Mizzou fan base, including me, and I am a Mizzou lifer.
All of my personal friends and family want anything but the Big 12 because the implosion isn't over. OU and TU are going to come to blows eventually and then our friends from KU, ISU and State are going to understand why the move to the SEC was Mizzou's golden parachute.
Look, I have said from the very beginning that I do not believe Mizzou is going to the SEC, and I still have trouble believing they will. But I have no idea how anyone could blame them if they do. This conference is a one-armed, two-headed, freak show.[/QUOTE]
If it is, then it's the fault of EVERY school that we didn't get the structure in place to maintain a conference that makes sense geographically, culturally, and competitively. Despite the dysfunction, the Big 12 still ranks near the top in conference strength across several sports.
UT and OU are a big part of the problem...they've never been able to see the larger picture like other conference heavyweights (tOSU, Mich., USC, Alab., etc.) and seek to strengthen the conference before securing their own positions. But the rest of us were never united enough to insist on the changes that could have kept the group together. That's on ALL of us (the administrators, anyway).
I accept that our conference mates see Mizzou as the villian-du-jour of conference realignment. That's OK. As I've said earlier, if the Big 12 survives and prospers with new members, then everybody walks away happy. If future problems lead to UT or OU bolting and the dissolution of the Big 12, Mizzou fans shouldn't be expecting a lot of congrats on getting out when they had the opportunity. ISU, KU, KSU, etc. will have other things to think about.