**** the refs

[CloneGuy8]

17 hit with the top of his head. Its actually more dangerous for him than the ball carrier.
The Baylor kid hit with his face mask.

There are several plays in every game where a defenders helmet makes contact with the guy they're tackling. If our 2nd best player on defense is going to get tossed for that, then hundreds of players across the country are going to get tossed every Saturday if its called the same for every game. It was not a good call that hurt us. We played like **** for the most part so it might not have mattered ultimately, but its frustrating and not in the spirit of the game.

 

[JusHappy2BeHere]

C'mon man. I don't necessarily disagree that it was targeting on us but there were at least 2 hits from Baylor that were very similar. And it wasn't even called on the field

Face is different from crown. That's the difference

 

[enisthemenace]

Face is different from crown. That's the difference

You’re stoned

 

[CloniesForLife]

Face is different from crown. That's the difference

I'll have to go back and find the replays again but it definitely looked like crown to me

 

[CYEATHAWK]

17 hit with the top of his head. Its actually more dangerous for him than the ball carrier.
The Baylor kid hit with his face mask.

Here you go

Always thought of you as a straight shooter.

Try again.

 

[clonedude]

I didn’t see a replay at the game so this is the first I’ve seen that Reeder penalty. Wow that’s horrible



What’s most frustrating to me is that ISU never gets any calls at home. You might expect some of this crap on the road, but at home there should be a favorable whistle. Every other team gets one

Is that a legal hit by Reeder though? I don't think it is, right? That call didn't bother me that much.... unless it truly is a legal hit.

 

[HoustonClone]

Face is different from crown. That's the difference

So a question....in the heat of the game, you honestly think that the refs could make that determination in the moment. Without a SINGLE review? They were THAT good to see everything you saw?

 

[CloneGuy8]

Face is different from crown. That's the difference

The Baylor defender did not use their face. You are not using your eyes. You're emotions are getting the best of your judgment. Good luck the rest of the year.

 

[CloniesForLife]

Is that a legal hit by Reeder though? I don't think it is, right? That call didn't bother me that much.... unless it truly is a legal hit.

What's the rule there? Was he not within 5 yards of the line? I honestly want to know. That one confused me

 

[JusHappy2BeHere]

So a question....in the heat of the game, you honestly think that the refs could make that determination in the moment. Without a SINGLE review? They were THAT good to see everything you saw?

No
That's why none of them were called on the field.
But all were reviewed. Only the one that was clearly head down was called

 

[CY88CE11]

17 hit with the top of his head. Its actually more dangerous for him than the ball carrier.
The Baylor kid hit with his face mask.

You are not using your eyes. You're emotions are getting the best of your judgment

Lol, says the poster who thinks the hit on Brock wasn't led with the crown. That hit actually made contact with the ball carrier's helmet, too. If only one of those is targeting, it's not the one that was called.

 

[CloniesForLife]

The Baylor defender did not use their face. You are not using your eyes. You're emotions are getting the best of your judgment. Good luck the rest of the year.

And that was just 1! There were a couple others. That is clear

 

[enisthemenace]

Always thought of you as a straight shooter.

Try again.

Unreal

 

[HoustonClone]

No
That's why none of them were called on the field.
But all were reviewed. Only the one that was clearly head down was called

Watch the video. You're blatantly wrong.

 

[enisthemenace]

Is that a legal hit by Reeder though? I don't think it is, right? That call didn't bother me that much.... unless it truly is a legal hit.

I think it was legal. Within 5 yards of the LoS.

 

[enisthemenace]

No
That's why none of them were called on the field.
But all were reviewed. Only the one that was clearly head down was called

You’re stoned

 

[CY88CE11]

Tells people to use their eyes and just ignores actual video evidence that proves them wrong. Amazing.

 

[andybernard]

Alright guys, just ignore the troll. Obviously he's here to get his rocks off and isn't too worried about looking like a ******* moron.

 

[TitanClone]

Poor defense, poor play calling, an indecisive QB, two turnovers, did us in more than the refs. They weren't good though.

I don't think we watched the same game. There was more to be desired from the defense, but poor? They weren't allowed to play. The refs set the tone with the targeting all the way up to that BS call on AJ.

The QB play I'll give, you, Dekkers had hirst first less than good game.

 

[enisthemenace]

I don’t even think the call against Freyler was even the worst call. The “block below the waist” on Anthony Johnson was inexplicable. And that was on 3rd and 8.