The Fran fade

I get they aren't playing well but you shorten good wins to a month and a lot of teams won't have many. That line stinks. I figured it would be Iowa -2.5 and I was ready to complain about that
But this is Michigan St we're talking about. This isn't your run of the mill team. Hell, extend that month out just a little and they lost to Northwestern at home. Yes, that Northwestern.
 
No, I think all of those teams would be pretty similar. But if you win the first round, I would much rather face a #2 or #3 than a #1 seed.

Absolutely. Any time you can avoid a 1 or 2 seed in the 2nd you are better off. Plus if you can get by the 3 or 4 there's a chance that the bracket is busted.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: jmb and iahawks
The B1G is definitely down. They crapped the bed last year in the NCAA tournament, too.
 
The B1G is definitely down. They crapped the bed last year in the NCAA tournament, too.
I think there’s some good teams and some quality teams like every other conference, but man do they have some absolute stinkers. Nebraska, NW, Maryland and Minnesota are just so bad.
 
I think there’s some good teams and some quality teams like every other conference, but man do they have some absolute stinkers. Nebraska, NW, Maryland and Minnesota are just so bad.
It seems like Indiana has been mediocre for years now too.
 
Don't forget Rutgers and pedifile U. Half the conference is garbage. How Rutgers is even talked about as a "bubble team" is a joke. Just shows how overrated the big 10 is yet again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRcyclone6
Don't forget Rutgers and pedifile U. Half the conference is garbage. How Rutgers is even talked about as a "bubble team" is a joke. Just shows how overrated the big 10 is yet again.
Rutgers was on a 4 game winning streak against #13 MSU, #16 OSU, #14 Wisconsin, and #12 Illinois. That’s why they’re on the bubble right now. We'll see how they end up.
 
But this is Michigan St we're talking about. This isn't your run of the mill team. Hell, extend that month out just a little and they lost to Northwestern at home. Yes, that Northwestern.
I can't argue against that. Last few years they haven't been up their standard. I expect a physical game tomorrow Izzo has already complained about the officials I think he's going to try and make the refs call 40 fouls and bet they won't
 
No,

Look at your original question to my original post: "How about getting McCafe and McCafe no-fat type players?"

My reply was pretty clear. I have no issue with THIN players and I used Halliburton as an example of a THIN player that played at ISU. Guys like Morris, Garrett & Clyburn were also pretty slender.
McCafe is a nickname for the McCaf brothers that has been used regularly here. Connor is McCafe and then the Patrick is called the other. It has nothing to do with their build, size or anything. So anything about fat, thin, boneless or whatever players was never mentioned in my post.
 
I can't argue against that. Last few years they haven't been up their standard. I expect a physical game tomorrow Izzo has already complained about the officials I think he's going to try and make the refs call 40 fouls and bet they won't
Izzo is a whiner but so is Fran. I bet Iowa shoots more FT's than their opponents more often than not.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron