Thank you Ed Obannon

I've come around on this. I blamed OBannon as well, but I've come to realize that it wouldn't have taken much for the NCAA to give that money to the players. If you're going to lose the licensing money anyway, why not win the PR battle and let the players get some?

Video game licensing would be the perfect way to get money to the revenue sports without getting into Title IX issues.


But yes, at this time of year I always regret selling my PS3.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The_Architect
I always get the updatedurosters for the last release.....but just not the same excitement of accurate schedules, field updates, player rankings ,etc.

AND in the last person the dang PA announcer always says "Iowa" not "Iowa State" and it grinds my gears every time.i hear it!!!!
 
I've come around on this. I blamed OBannon as well, but I've come to realize that it wouldn't have taken much for the NCAA to give that money to the players. If you're going to lose the licensing money anyway, why not win the PR battle and let the players get some?

Video game licensing would be the perfect way to get money to the revenue sports without getting into Title IX issues.


But yes, at this time of year I always regret selling my PS3.

I had gotten rid of my Ps3....but acouple years back boughht a used one just to play it again! Lol
 
I hate going back to my Xbox 360 to play NCAA 14. I believe there is a new college football game coming out in 2019. It wouldn't have the licensing that EA had but it will customizable.
 
I've come around on this. I blamed OBannon as well, but I've come to realize that it wouldn't have taken much for the NCAA to give that money to the players. If you're going to lose the licensing money anyway, why not win the PR battle and let the players get some?

Video game licensing would be the perfect way to get money to the revenue sports without getting into Title IX issues.


But yes, at this time of year I always regret selling my PS3.
This. Or just have them sign a waiver in exchange for a free copy of the game or something. The vast majority would have done it in an instant. But the NCAA model is dependent on the notion that the players aren't part of the product, sonethsom that their own marketing proves is not true. Pure greed is all it is.
 
I miss the NCAA football games but I don't miss spending $60 each year for it.
 
I hate going back to my Xbox 360 to play NCAA 14. I believe there is a new college football game coming out in 2019. It wouldn't have the licensing that EA had but it will customizable.

I expect absolutely nothing from that game but I will be buying it
 
It took someone to get the ball rolling so I'll always blame Ed O'bannon. Screw him and his lawsuit.

Screw. Him.

Agreed. I'm sure it would have happened eventually, but then I would have just hated someone else. Screw Ed O'bannon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC Cy
It took someone to get the ball rolling so I'll always blame Ed O'bannon. Screw him and his lawsuit.

Screw. Him.
That's where I'm at... Get me wrong, the NCAA is ultimately the problem, but O'Bannon played a role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC Cy
The role of pointing out the problem? Sounds like a good deed there.

He wasn't doing it for the good of student athletes. He saw himself on a version of NCAA Basketball and was mad he didn't get his cut. Not like he didn't make any money while he was at UCLA anyways.

I don't have a problem with compensating players for their likenesses, but they will never find a way to do it without allowing schools like tOSU and Alabama pay their players more than everyone else and continue to game the system.

Giving college players money for being in a video game just opens the door for having to pay them for jersey sales, and autographs, and the landslide will continue until it further pollutes college athletics.
 
He wasn't doing it for the good of student athletes. He saw himself on a version of NCAA Basketball and was mad he didn't get his cut. Not like he didn't make any money while he was at UCLA anyways.

I don't have a problem with compensating players for their likenesses, but they will never find a way to do it without allowing schools like tOSU and Alabama pay their players more than everyone else and continue to game the system.

Giving college players money for being in a video game just opens the door for having to pay them for jersey sales, and autographs, and the landslide will continue until it further pollutes college athletics.
Further pollute? Not sure that it can get more polluted. All of the stuff you described is already happening. There's a very healthy black market for autographs and merchandise. Letting players benefit from their own likeness wouldn't do anything that isn't already being done.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CycloneErik

Help Support Us

Become a patron