Solve this equation

What is the answer?


  • Total voters
    253
tenor.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: stateofmind
BTW - modern calculators don't use the "Reverse Polish Notation" of the older TI scientific calculators, which may contribute to confusion with PEMDAS rules. Dunno. Math was a while back. Loved it...until I got to trig. I'm too much of a straightline thinker to handle theoretical math. If you can't solve an equation, you don't invent an imaginary number to fix it. ;)

A mistake plus Keleven gets you home by 7!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY
Bingo. For people who didn't do much math beyond algebra they are going to work the parenthesis then go left to right with multiplication based on order of operations.

For people who have done a lot of higher level math, they are going to view the implied multiplication as you have it here. Basically it acts like a second set of parenthesis putting everything after the division sign into the denomenator.
Disagree. As someone who took 20+ higher level math courses at Iowa state; I did not view it as you suggest one with such a background would.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: flycy and cycloneG
The division symbol can always be expressed as a fraction. The answer is 1.
 
I think the only thing I learned from this thread is I'll never come to CF with a math question. That and the OP is a ******* monster.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: ImJustKCClone
Well, first - I had a typo in the first line. :oops:

But I already explained it. You reduce what's in the parentheses, but you don't remove the parenthesis. Per PEMDAS, parentheses and Exponents come before multiplication and division, so you reduce the parentheses by completing the parenthetical operation, giving you 8.
The parentheses portion of PEMDAS applies to operations WITHIN the parentheses. 4(4)=4*4=4(2+2)=4*(2+2)
 
WHAT IS THE A N S W E R ?
1 2 34 56 789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
The answer is 16
 
Makes sense. All the folks who put "1" using that 1917 math textbook.


It would be interesting to know ages to see if there is any correspondence with answers. I'm 60 and I answered 1. So that fits your theory.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron