He is better, not by much though so you are half right.
Are you trolling?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is better, not by much though so you are half right.
Not sure what to make of this. I would have said Beilein, probably close Turgeon second
Moss?In the last 5 games Moss is averaging 2.2 ppg and is shooting 20% from the field.
I was trying to say that Jackson is better than everyone on the entire team with the exception of maybe Cook. But the guards on Iowa compared to Jackson? Yeah that's not even close. Jackson>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Iowa guards outside of Jok.Cook does not play guard.
What is wrong with you?
What have I said that is so wrong? I said those coaches offered and wanted him. That is the case when you offer a player. You don't say, "Here Luka, here is a scholly to come play for me, but really we don't want your ass, go somewhere else."Really? Are you a hok fan or are you trolling me? A team that has Fran McCrafferty as their coach should know all about fallback recruits.
You forgot materials needed (in my experience, maybe slight exaggeration and perhaps just describing middle America): backwards Fred Durst style Hawks/Cubs baseball hat, LOTS of Journey and AC/DC on the Ipod/Discman, either a Hawkeye or high school shirt from the year you graduated, and a certain belligerent, yet controlled demeanor like your owed something, so you can verbally harass and scrutinize anyone for wearing an ISU shirt or rival high school in 'your bar'.
I dont troll.
Well I trust his offer list and the coaches who wanted him over you or some ranking. Alabama, Notre Dame, Georgetown, Georgia, Indiana, Louisville, Northwestern, Virginia Tech all wanted him, so I'm happy Iowa got him.
Yeah. I'm sure there was a reason for it. Roy Williams doesn't just hand out offers for the hell of it.North Carolina wanted Woodbury, too.
Remember when North Carolina wanted Woodbury lololololololWhat have I said that is so wrong? I said those coaches offered and wanted him. That is the case when you offer a player. You don't say, "Here Luka, here is a scholly to come play for me, but really we don't want your ass, go somewhere else."
I don't get your point at all.
Yeah. I'm sure there was a reason for it. Roy Williams doesn't just hand out offers for the hell of it.
I'm sure Arizona and Oregon wanted Wigginton too. I fail to understand your points? A scholarship offer to someone says you want them. So, Matt Campbell is just offering all these football recruits because he doesn't want them?Remember when North Carolina wanted Woodbury lolololololol
No clue, I'm not Roy Williams, so I can't speak to that. Iowa State, Cal, Ohio State, Virginia, Utah, and Wisconsin all offered him too. So, looks like Hoiberg wanted him.What was the reason for it you think?
I'm sure Arizona and Oregon wanted Wigginton too. I fail to understand your points? A scholarship offer to someone says you want them. So, Matt Campbell is just offering all these football recruits because he doesn't want them?
My point is Fran has an awesome track record of developing big nonathletic players. I'm sure Garza will be great.I'm sure Arizona and Oregon wanted Wigginton too. I fail to understand your points? A scholarship offer to someone says you want them. So, Matt Campbell is just offering all these football recruits because he doesn't want them?
Bohannon's best attribute is his shooting and Jackson is a better shooter than him.
I should have worded my post differently. Didn't mean not sure what to make of you thinking Matta was a good coach. But not sure what to make of the whole Matta situation right now, I know he is a good coach but they have been pretty rough since their EE in 2013.Lmao, not you too. So the guy has been to multiple Final Fours and he sucks? Without looking it up I bet Ohio State is in the TOP 3 with Izzo and Ryan in the last 15 years for Big Ten wins.
Yeah because comparing 2 guys that play a similar style and position is exactly the same as comparing a guy that lives under the basket to a guy who shot from all over the floor.Since you are using strictly shooting % to determine this then Pemsl is a better shooter than Georges Niang was at ISU. Am I doing this right?
Yeah because comparing 2 guys that play a similar style and position is exactly the same as comparing a guy that lives under the basket to a guy who shot from all over the floor.