.
Wish the state would do something similar with some of the County Court House and School systems.
Bigger schools are not always better or the answer.
As for the agents. They do play a role but as time goes by they play less and less of a role.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.
Wish the state would do something similar with some of the County Court House and School systems.
Bigger schools are not always better or the answer.
As for the agents. They do play a role but as time goes by they play less and less of a role.
Bigger schools are not always better or the answer.
As for the agents. They do play a role but as time goes by they play less and less of a role.
You're correct, bigger schools are not always better. Theres a balance. However, you cannot tell me that the schools that have 5 people in a senior class are able to provide the educational opportunities for all the diverse educational needs -from special education to gifted\talented to AP classes to vocational skills, or even electives like music and art that even more medium or large sized schools are. I'm definitely not advocating all schools be valley-sized (i came from waukee, back when the graduating class was about 160) but there comes a point where the school sizes are too small to justify the resources.
I'm not suggesting bigger schools at all. What I do find wasterfull is a seperate superintendent for each school. You could easily have one superintendent for each county(okay perhaps more then that in Metro counties.
There are some super small schools yes, but if it works for them, they should leave good enough alone. My wife had a friend that had 6 people in her class and she has done very well for herself. What happens in HS doenst always translate to how you do in college.
Schools need their own superintendent, but there is no reason he cannot do more that just be a superintendent, teach a class or 2 or something else. If we go to the county idea, you know as well as I they will have to have people under them for diffent schools or areas and once you do that you are back to where you started.
If the Cedar Rapids community school district which includes 3 4-A schools (Washington, Jefferson, Kennedy) can get by with 1 superindendent, I think a single superintendent can handle a half dozen smaller schools. Maybe each individual school could have an associate superintendent that also teaches stuff, but I don't think each school needs a full time superintendent.
Exactly. You need a principal at each school of course.
If the Cedar Rapids community school district which includes 3 4-A schools (Washington, Jefferson, Kennedy) can get by with 1 superindendent, I think a single superintendent can handle a half dozen smaller schools. Maybe each individual school could have an associate superintendent that also teaches stuff, but I don't think each school needs a full time superintendent.
There are some super small schools yes, but if it works for them, they should leave good enough alone. My wife had a friend that had 6 people in her class and she has done very well for herself. What happens in HS doenst always translate to how you do in college.
In theory that is fine, but whent the state provides $6-7,000 per student, then the people of the broader funding area do have a right to debate the size.
[.
In theory that is fine, but whent the state provides $6-7,000 per student, then the people of the broader funding area do have a right to debate the size.
If the funding is the same per student, let the district decide if they need to consolidate.
If the funding is the same per student, let the district decide if they need to consolidate.
Here is what it boils down to, if the state, (ie the non residents of the district are the only ones making a district viable, then they have an equal or greater say than the local).
For the record, I favor smaller schools, and local control. Many studies have shown schools can be to large, and to small.
Bottom line if you use non-local funding those making the funding will expect input mechanism.
The question is by changing size, and structures, can they lower the fee/student over time.
Some of these small schools may be able to 'get by' with that money, but much less effectively. Schools that are at a more proper size (not too large or too small) can offer a much wider range of opportunities, from vocational to arts to special education to advanced classes that will better prepare students for college. When medium sized schools can do that for 6-7k but smaller schools cannot for the same amount, it becomes about what return on investment we can get for our state dollar.
well, that depends what you call small, and what you call large.Some from the rural schools would consider a school like waukee a large school, where i would say its more medium. By small i mean those schools with 25 or less in a graduating class.
With that few, you simply cant provide the same types of things a medium-large school can, in terms of range of subjects taught, extracurricular activities, electives, advanced courses, etc. Once you get above a certain point, you start seeing it go the other way since there are too many people wanting to get into those opportunities, but thats a whole different topic altogether, as nobody is wanting to combine these small schools into mega schools, just into something more realistic (total high school size of about 4-500 would be good)