Lots of people are talking about how stubborn Matt is about the offense, but I personally think the staff has tried to run portions of the offense that they felt best fit the talent on this team. Going into the season, the thought was that we would have an inexperienced QB and a very talented TE room. Thus we have used a lot of three TE sets. The thought is it allows the TEs to create a matchup issue because of their multiplicity (block and receive). The issue is that while talented, the TEs are not very good blockers yet. This coupled with poor offensive line play has caused significant issues in the running game. Those issues were not so glaring against UNI because it was an easy win and then we struggled against Iowa, but that could be explained away as Iowa's defense. Now that we struggled against Ohio, the staff must either fix the blocking by to OL and TEs or pivot to another plan of attack. Less TEs and more passing seems like the logical change, but how talented are our WRs. We played that way when Matt got here because we didn't have TEs for a couple of years. Even if that change is made, the OL run blocking must be fixed. It seems to me that we are asking our linemen to be more athletic in their blocks than what they are capable of. I think something there needs to change.