RPI back to #10, showdown @#9 looming

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
66,214
52,877
113
LA LA Land
RPI back to #10

We've now beat #1, #6, #7, #23 Neutral, #39, @#51
Losses: @#1, @#19, #26, #151 Neutral

If we win @A&M, without a lot of research, I'd have to assume ISU and maybe Oklahoma would have the best collection of wins in college hoops.
 
[h=1]Jeff BorzelloESPN Staff Writer [/h]Iowa State now has three RPI top-10 wins (Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa). No one else has more than one.
 
Dat UNI loss doe...

giphy.gif
 
If we move into 10, past Iowa I assume, that would give us an OU 2 each. Kinda of an oddity I guess?

Iowa RPI wouldn't be hurt if we beat A&M. But A&M could possibly drop from 9 down to 11 or 12.

Either way at the end of this weekend there's a chance we own wins against 80% of the AP top 5 which would pretty much be unheard of. Most teams wouldn't ever have even played 4 of the top 5 at any point in the year.
 
Baylor loss stings more because we mailed in a half at home and would be in 1st in B12.

I don't know, that UNI loss could easily be the difference of a seed line come March, similar to the Drake loss back in 1999-2000.
 
I don't know, that UNI loss could easily be the difference of a seed line come March, similar to the Drake loss back in 1999-2000.

but this year there are more top 10 wins than 1999-2000. I would say winning like we have this year solves the UNI issue.
 
Iowa State has now beaten 3 projected #1 seeds from the CBS sports bracketology. Oklahoma Kansas and ugh Iowa.
 
Defeating any one of iowa, kansas, or oklahoma is much more gratifying than losing to uni was disappointing, and it's not even close.
 
I don't know, that UNI loss could easily be the difference of a seed line come March, similar to the Drake loss back in 1999-2000.

We could have been a 1 seed that year but chose the 2 seed so we could play in Minneapolis. Forget where I heard that but remember it being someone credible.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron