My experience with these is that it is usually only the wife that posts anything. I don't understand why they just don't claim it as their own.
Random Thoughts V
- Thread starter cstrunk
- Start date
- Status
My experience with these is that it is usually only the wife that posts anything. I don't understand why they just don't claim it as their own.
Sure. You can keep pounding your chest until Nickels tells you you're getting a joint page.
Woo, did you hear about Canon City Colorado HS sexting case? looking at prosecuting hundreds of kids possibly. My non lawyery view is delete that stuff, tell them what they could be facing, and if they get caught again then prosecute them.
Skipped the FB threads is there any reason to stop in?
Skipped the FB threads is there any reason to stop in?
I am very glad I didn't have to deal with that when raising my kids.
Son has allowed his oldest daughter (9) to play "Clash of Clans"....showed her how to build her village, etc (vague descriptions because I really don't understand the game). He told us he found her forming her own clan and inviting people to join her, and had to have the "good people, bad people on the internet" conversation with her.
Kids can run rings around their parents in terms of emerging technology. Parents have their work cut out for them.
PapaLew doesn't want to have a Facebook account. He never posts on mine, but does like to see what our kids post. I've also gotten him interested in an Appalachian Bear Rescue page, following the rehabilitation of orphaned black bear cubs. He knows my password, and he's welcome to use it, but it just doesn't interest him.
But it's your Facebook. What he does in accessing yours is fine. I just think it's stupid to have joint accounts. If you both use Facebook accounts that much, just have your own.
Plus, maybe I want to be FB friends with my buddy but not with his stupid, annoying wife and kids.
Oh jeez, no I didn't see that. My personal opinion is the legislature should step in to decriminalize the behavior if it's between consenting teens because I don't think it's a big deal. But states won't do that, or add Romeo and Juliet laws (where sexual conduct between children of similar ages is decriminalized because that wasn't what those laws were designed to prevent) because you're condoning sexual behavior between teens and no one wants to do that.
When we had our sexual assault unit, I did learn something interesting about those prosecutions. Sometimes it's a zealous prosecutor or parents who lack perspective brow beating the prosecutor into filing charges. Other times it's actually a case where one of the teens was actually doing something very wrong (like really pressuring their significant other into having sex), but that's a ***** to prove, so they go with this. Not saying it happened here, but it could be.
As bad as that game may have appeared on the boob tube, I can assure you it was worse in person.
One bright side: we were far enough from the band that we didn't have to listen to Boomer Sooner every 30 seconds all night long.
One bright side: we were far enough from the band that we didn't have to listen to Boomer Sooner every 30 seconds all night long.
Fine. No joint Facebook with Nickels. But since I don't have a Facebook page, can I tag along on yours? I promise to only forward things that could bring us bad luck if we don't send to another 5 people.
- Status