Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

PREDICTIONS: Oklahoma FB in the SEC

Where will Oklahoma FB be in the SEC in 5-10 years

  • Elite

    Votes: 16 5.0%

  • Successful, but shy of Elite

    Votes: 230 71.7%

  • Mediocre

    Votes: 71 22.1%

  • Below Average

    Votes: 4 1.2%

  • Bottom Dweller

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    321
Cyrealist said:
I agree but it seems statistically improbable that Texas will be able to maintain its mediocrity indefinitely. I think there's a coach out there somewhere who can ignore the alumni, install their own system, and be successful.
Click to expand...
I honestly think you're right but I don't see Sark as the guy. Now, Chris Peterson would have been a hell of a get and could have got them turned around in no time IMO.
I mean, in our lifetimes did we ever think we'd beat them 3 times in a row? Crazy.
 
keepngoal said:
In my view they will displace LSU. Elite now and then, damn good all the other times.

Different football in the SEC, if they keep their Riley identity, they’ll be more successful. Who knows where they land with the new guy.
Click to expand...
Good call too. I'm not a BK hater because I think he did about as well at Notre Dame as he could have but he's looked like a clown so far at LSU.
I personally would have rather had Lane Kiffin than BK if I'm an LSU fan.
 
Stewo said:
I meant that A&M initially struggled in the adjustment period, but they picked up where they left off as a program. They're essentially the same in the SEC as they were in the Big 12.
Click to expand...

According to this they were better right off the bat and have been overall as good or better than what they did in the Big 12.

List of Texas A&M Aggies football seasons - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

I'd guess OU will be that or a little better.

FWIW I thought ATM has been having way worse seasons recently.
 
jdoggivjc said:
Better than A&M, much better than Mizzou, but not going to be Alabama like they're convinced they will.
Click to expand...
A&M hasn't even won the SEC West yet!

Not sure if the SEC is going to stick to divisions or not, which will have a lot to do with it.

Either way, it will be a tough road for OU, as even when Alabama doesn't win the SEC or the West in the Saban Era, they are still a tough nut. Plus, whichever team wins the West instead of them since 2010 is a tough nut that year too: Auburn (2010, 2013 and 2017) and LSU (2011 and 2019). Then, if they get past that, they have to face Georgia who is on the way of replacing Alabama as the dominant team in the league as long as Kirby is there.

Oklahoma will have a year here and there like Auburn or LSU and be super nasty in that given year, but they will be just another good (8-4, 9-3, 10-2) team in most years.

Texas is just doomed to mediocrity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: coolerifyoudid
AlaCyclone said:
A&M hasn't even won the SEC West yet!

Not sure if the SEC is going to stick to divisions or not, which will have a lot to do with it.

Either way, it will be a tough road for OU, as even when Alabama doesn't win the SEC or the West in the Saban Era, they are still a tough nut. Plus, which ever team wins the West instead of them since 2010 is a tough nut that year too: Auburn (2010, 2013 and 2017) and LSU (2011 and 2019). Then, if they get past that, they have to face Georgia who is on the way of replacing Alabama as the dominant team in the league as long as Kirby is there.

Oklahoma will have a year here and there like Auburn or LSU and be super nasty in that given year, but they will be just another good (8-4, 9-3, 10-2) team in most years.

Texas is just doomed to mediocrity.
Click to expand...
and that is a good point... getting to that SEC playoff game means winning a division. West has been locked down most every year.

But it doesn't matter... its the $$$$$$$$ that matter. Everything else is just... well... everything else.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AlaCyclone
Boxerdaddy said:
With Texas and Oklahoma scheduled to leave the B12, what are your predictions for the future for them in the SEC?

I think Texas will be okay, should be in the upper half to third. Their affiliation with the SEC may actually help them, but acquisition of talent has never been an issue, it's the execution.

Before Lincoln Riley left for USC, I thought Oklahoma would probably be just fine. But with that loss, I honestly think they turn into the Nebraska of the SEC. Once powerful, but now mediocre at best.

When I look at it, what would attract athletes to Oklahoma? Winning history? Nice facilities? Dime a dozen in the SEC. It will be interesting to see how they do now without Riley. If they fall back this year, i'd look for them to slip even farther once they hit the SEC. There are some cupcakes in the SEC for sure, but the top is usually crowded. The more I look at it I think they played themselves and I could see them in the middle to bottom of the league in 5 to 10 years.

What are your thoughts and predictions? Do they remain a powerhouse?
Click to expand...
Mediocre reason being, they have yet to bean an SEC team in the playoff.
 
keepngoal said:
and that is a good point... getting to that SEC playoff game means winning a division. West has been locked down most every year.

But it doesn't matter... its the $$$$$$$$ that matter. Everything else is just... well... everything else.
Click to expand...
I'm just kind of looking at aTm historically now and man, the perception (by some) of them being an upper tier team isn't really warranted.
Honestly, aTm right now is about what Florida was under Mullen and they canned him.
 
JP4CY said:
I'm just kind of looking at aTm historically now and man, the perception (by some) of them being an upper tier team isn't really warranted.
Honestly, aTm right now is about what Florida was under Mullen and they canned him.
Click to expand...

They're fake IDish.

Best consistent 'modern' stretch was mid-80s to late 90s.
 
Boxerdaddy said:
With Texas and Oklahoma scheduled to leave the B12, what are your predictions for the future for them in the SEC?

I think Texas will be okay, should be in the upper half to third. Their affiliation with the SEC may actually help them, but acquisition of talent has never been an issue, it's the execution.

Before Lincoln Riley left for USC, I thought Oklahoma would probably be just fine. But with that loss, I honestly think they turn into the Nebraska of the SEC. Once powerful, but now mediocre at best.

When I look at it, what would attract athletes to Oklahoma? Winning history? Nice facilities? Dime a dozen in the SEC. It will be interesting to see how they do now without Riley. If they fall back this year, i'd look for them to slip even farther once they hit the SEC. There are some cupcakes in the SEC for sure, but the top is usually crowded. The more I look at it I think they played themselves and I could see them in the middle to bottom of the league in 5 to 10 years.

What are your thoughts and predictions? Do they remain a powerhouse?
Click to expand...
I know this is primarily about OU but why are we just skipping past this bonkers assumption that Texas is automatically going to be better in the SEC than they were in the Big 12.
 
Urbandale2013 said:
I know this is primarily about OU but why are we just skipping past this bonkers assumption that Texas is automatically going to be better in the SEC than they were in the Big 12.
Click to expand...
They won’t lose to KU anymore so that instantly makes you at least look better. That’s the only reason I’ve got though.
 
UT has been a mess since they canned Mack Brown and going to the SEC is a disaster. OU has always recruited well in the fertile Texas HS ground and I expect they will benefit from moving to the SEC exploiting UT’s mediocrity. The only thing that is the unknown is if Venables is another Harbaugh who was supposed to return Michigan to elite status and can’t get over the hump. Another example is Penn State who has been successful but not elite once they entered the B10 arena.
 
swiacy said:
UT has been a mess since they canned Mack Brown and going to the SEC is a disaster. OU has always recruited well in the fertile Texas HS ground and I expect they will benefit from moving to the SEC exploiting UT’s mediocrity. The only thing that is the unknown is if Venables is another Harbaugh who was supposed to return Michigan to elite status and can’t get over the hump. Another example is Penn State who has been successful but not elite once they entered the B10 arena.
Click to expand...

He resigned on his own. Perhaps he was pushed out but UT started turning into a mess after the LHN came through.
 
madguy30 said:
He resigned on his own. Perhaps he was pushed out but UT started turning into a mess after the LHN came through.
Click to expand...

Resigned may be accurate technically, same way as Johnny Orr resigned at ISU from what I've heard/remember. Dang that is getting to be a long time ago.
 
I don't think Texas changes much in the SEC. They'll still find a way to win 7-8 games per year, but the fan base will be satisfied because wins are coming against SEC teams and they don't have to risk losing to Kansas and Iowa State anymore, not to mention all the "lesser" Texas schools.
 
NWICY said:
Resigned may be accurate technically, same way as Johnny Orr resigned at ISU from what I've heard/remember. Dang that is getting to be a long time ago.
Click to expand...

Yeah I think he was on the way out anyway. I remember after ISU beat them in Austin in 2010 he went off about his frustrations with how he'd warned the team and they didn't take him on it. I think player egos started being an issue and things were unraveling internally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom
Back