I’m no star athlete, but on numerous occasions I’ve had a cat clip my heel just the right way (and not hard - just brushing past it) and it nearly knocked me on my ass. Now, instead of walking down the hall, instead I’ve been running around the pitch for 80 minutes on a hot, humid day and, at full sprint, someone trying to steal the ball comes in cleats up and instead crashes into my legs. Funny that if this was baseball and this was a runner sliding into home cleats up it would be viewed as the runner deserving of a beating (or at least deserving of the HBP that’s coming his way next time he bats), but if this was soccer? No - the guy who took the dirty tackle needs to shut up, quit feigning injury, and get back in the damn game already. The double standard is so ridiculous it just makes non-soccer fans look stupid. Remember, these are the idiots that complained about Pulisic faking injury after scoring against Iran when he took a knee to the nuts, the proof being 10 minutes later he was out there trying to finish the half.
I also do this sometimes.
- Only a game winning FG is exciting in football, the other FGs really aren't at all.
- I make TDs worth 1 point and only game winning FGs worth 1 point
Here's ISU football's "soccer" scores in Big 12 play:
8-2 loss
2-1 loss
2-2 loss (lost in pks, or could be a tie in league play)
4-2 win
3-1 loss
3-3 loss (lost in pks, or could be a tie in league play)
1-0 loss
2-1 loss
4-3 loss
Higher scoring than soccer just slightly, but not by a ton. None of those scores are unheard of soccer socres. Just the 0-0, 1-0, 1-1 is more common in soccer than 7-3 or 10-6 games are in football (those games do happen though).
You can do the same in reverse. Just multiple a goal by 7, add 6 fg points to winner and 3 fg points to loser.
Here's France's world cup american football scores:
34-10 win over Australia
20-10 win over Denmark
13-3 loss to Tunesia
27-10 win over Poland
20-10 win over England
Tell me those don't look like totally normal college football scores.