Nolan's Oppenheimer

I mentioned this somewhere else, maybe in a different thread, maybe earlier in this one, but after having seen both "Band of Brothers" and then "The Pacific", and even knowing that those shows for as well done as they were can only be so realistic up to a point, that there is no doubt in my mind that if I could have made the choice at the time as an 18-year old kid in 1942/1943 that I would have signed up for the European theaters of war after seeing how brutal and bloody the island-hopping battles in the Pacific were.
My Dad weighed around 100 pounds in the evac hospital. Not sure how he carried his gun and pack.
 
Not a sequel or anything, but if anybody is curious about the parallel Soviet nuclear weapons program running at the same time as the Manhattan Project, this book is an excellent tale:

Stalin and the Bomb



Which theater was "easier" depends on what you were doing.

I wouldn't have wanted to have been a solider or Marine involved in the war of attrition on Guadalcanal or during the island-hopping campaign across the central Pacific to Okinawa.

But if I was in the USAAC, I would have much rather been in the Pacific. Flying B-29s at high altitude with minimal Japanese interception and AAA fire and hanging out on sandy beaches between missions sounds positively cushy compared to what the air war over Europe was like for bomber crews.

I don't know how well I would have done cooped up in a submarine for months at a time in the Pacific, too, terrified one mechanical failure could send me past crush depth at any given moment.
I read that the casualty rate among bomber crews was high enough that you were pretty unlikely to survive your tour of duty.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: isutrevman
I read that the casualty rate among bomber crews was high enough that you were pretty unlikely to survive your tour of duty.

Roughly 45% were killed.

Another 5% wounded (notice this was a low rate... not many limped away from a crash).

Another 5% captured.

So roughly flip a coin if you'd make it through your 25 missions.

Nothing else was even close in terms of casualty rate.
 
Not a sequel or anything, but if anybody is curious about the parallel Soviet nuclear weapons program running at the same time as the Manhattan Project, this book is an excellent tale:

Stalin and the Bomb



Which theater was "easier" depends on what you were doing.

I wouldn't have wanted to have been a solider or Marine involved in the war of attrition on Guadalcanal or during the island-hopping campaign across the central Pacific to Okinawa.

But if I was in the USAAC, I would have much rather been in the Pacific. Flying B-29s at high altitude with minimal Japanese interception and AAA fire and hanging out on sandy beaches between missions sounds positively cushy compared to what the air war over Europe was like for bomber crews.

I don't know how well I would have done cooped up in a submarine for months at a time in the Pacific, too, terrified one mechanical failure could send me past crush depth at any given moment.
You should probably read Unbroken about the life of Louis Zamperini and what he endured lost at sea for over a month after his bomber went down and then his stay in a Japanese POW camp. It wasn't all safe missions and sandy beaches in the Pacific either.
 
You should probably read Unbroken about the life of Louis Zamperini and what he endured lost at sea for over a month after his bomber went down and then his stay in a Japanese POW camp. It wasn't all safe missions and sandy beaches in the Pacific either.

I’ve not read that particular one but have read plenty of other accounts of being a POW of the Japanese. It wasn’t fun, obviously. But playing the odds… you’d want to fly in the Pacific. Japanese air power and AAA against high-altitude bombers was minimal compared to what the Germans were throwing at them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman
Building on my previous point here, @VeloClone --

U.S. casualties from the air campaign against Germany

1686012633286.png

Total U.S. casualties in the war was about 1.1 million. About 7.4% of U.S. casualties were from the air war over Europe and, as I mentioned previously, a very high number of those were KIA.

Compared that to...

U.S. casualties from the strategic bombings of Japan

1686012774215.png

I'm taking those odds. Still wouldn't want to die or be captured. Still flying military aircraft packed with what was cutting edge and experimental aviation technology for the 1940s with a cargo of high explosives. Still navigating over thousands of miles of open ocean with no GPS and rudimentary radio technology for our modern standards. Things still could go terribly, regrettably wrong for you in such a situation.

But the Japanese weren't filling the sky with shrapnel like the Germans were.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Gorm
In 2011 I met a new client. Bea was 93 and totally independent. Over the ensuing years(!!!!), I heard her story. It was remarkable.

She married an engineer involved with ballistics at the Rock Island Arsenal facility in 1939. The Arsenal was then, and still is a major DoD operations center, home of the First Army and multiple other Army commands.

In January, 1942, they received an order to transfer. They first had to get to Albuquerque, NM. There, they were met by US officials and were quietly transferred to Los Alamos. Welcome to the atomic bomb world.

Bea said that when they heard "the boys are going to light one off today", they would grab their "special" sunglasses and go watch the detonation of a trigger bomb.

I found an archive of photo's on a DoE web site and showed it to Bea. At 97 she was naming people in the images I showed her. She told the front office how much she enjoyed the movie I showed her. B^)
 
I’ve not read that particular one but have read plenty of other accounts of being a POW of the Japanese. It wasn’t fun, obviously. But playing the odds… you’d want to fly in the Pacific. Japanese air power and AAA against high-altitude bombers was minimal compared to what the Germans were throwing at them.
It's really great because it's almost broken down into 4 parts: 1. His childhood, becoming an elite runner, and running at the Berlin Olympics 2. Joining the military, crashing, and surviving weeks at sea 3. Being a POW and surviving the brutal Japanese camps 4. His comeback to running and his postwar life. It's really a great book. The movie doesn't do it justice at all.
 
Although it sounds like his work in the trailer, Hans Zimmer did not compose the music for this.

Ludwig Goransson basically apes Zimmer, which is fine because he's outstanding.

There are actually a lot of really other film composers right now - Mark Mothersbaugh, Henry Jackman to name a few.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman
Yep!

Also, the U.S. sent Japan communiques stating that the U.S. was in possession of weapons of such terrible destructive power and were prepared to use them without a full surrender. Japan was given a very fair chance to avoid the destruction, but they chose to ignore warnings. Culturally, surrender just wasn’t something Japan could do… until sadly, two cities were vaporized, innocent lives lost, and even more innocent lives altered forever. Japan had been unbowed through centuries of conflict, but this wound was too great to preserver further.

The likely other path was U.S. troops in pitched combat with what remaining army Japan had and women and children. Terrible choice either way.

Let's be honest we were already firebombing Japan with napalm and with the way their buildings were constructed we were burning people alive in terrible circumstances. Curtis LeMay said we would be war criminals for what we were already doing. So if it's an either/or thing, ending the war with one big bomb or two is probably better than melting people with napalm.
 
Roughly 45% were killed.

Another 5% wounded (notice this was a low rate... not many limped away from a crash).

Another 5% captured.

So roughly flip a coin if you'd make it through your 25 missions.

Nothing else was even close in terms of casualty rate.
German submarine crews might ask you to hold their beer, as might a few others. Although I agree making it through 25 missions was a challenge.
 
Another good read laying in some context for the decision to use the nuclear bombs is The Fleet at Flood Tide by James Hornfischer. A lot of the decision seemed to hinge on what was witnessed in the invasion of Saipan, where it became clear to US Commanders that Japan would not surrender and would rather die resisting, to the inclusion of mass suicide/execution of civilian women and children to avoid capture or surrender. Well worth the read--as are many of Hornfischer's books--in considering the situation as understood by US Commanders in that period as well as the hold that the military leaders actually held on power in Japan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone
German submarine crews might ask you to hold their beer, as might a few others. Although I agree making it through 25 missions was a challenge.

My wife's late stepgrandfather was a submariner in the Pacific.

He was perfectly willing to talk about his experience in the war but he said there wasn't much to tell for him. Just months at a time in a tin can never seeing the sun working on the power plant.

He told me he never really knew what was going on with the weapons room at the front or on the bridge. His engineering officer strongly discouraged any thoughts about anything but their immediate duties. All he was concerned with was the smell of diesel and being covered in grease all the time.

He'd only know they were in combat when he heard the compressed air "THWUMP" of a torpedo launch.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Marcelason78
My wife's late stepgrandfather was a submariner in the Pacific.

He was perfectly willing to talk about his experience in the war but he said there wasn't much to tell for him. Just months at a time in a tin can never seeing the sun working on the power plant.

He told me he never really knew what was going on with the weapons room at the front or on the bridge. His engineering officer strongly discouraged any thoughts about anything but their immediate duties. All he was concerned with was the smell of diesel and being covered in grease all the time.

He'd only know they were in combat when he heard the compressed air "THWUMP" of a torpedo launch.

This makes me claustrophobic just reading it.
 
This makes me claustrophobic just reading it.
Then don't watch Das Boot.

Das_boot_ver1.jpg
 
My wife's late stepgrandfather was a submariner in the Pacific.

He was perfectly willing to talk about his experience in the war but he said there wasn't much to tell for him. Just months at a time in a tin can never seeing the sun working on the power plant.

He told me he never really knew what was going on with the weapons room at the front or on the bridge. His engineering officer strongly discouraged any thoughts about anything but their immediate duties. All he was concerned with was the smell of diesel and being covered in grease all the time.

He'd only know they were in combat when he heard the compressed air "THWUMP" of a torpedo launch.
I'm not sure on the casualty rate of US subs overall, but German U-boat had a 75% casualty rate. https://historyincharts.com/german-u-boat-losses-in-world-war-ii/. I believe that--beyond small units which were sometimes wiped out--this was the highest casualty rate of any broad classification of service in WW II.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sigmapolis

Help Support Us

Become a patron