I disagree but thats alright.From hind side, I know he wishes he would have cleaned house the first year and started from year 2. That's the only second guessing I know of.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree but thats alright.From hind side, I know he wishes he would have cleaned house the first year and started from year 2. That's the only second guessing I know of.
From hind side, I know he wishes he would have cleaned house the first year and started from year 2. That's the only second guessing I know of.
Watching the way that he has recruited especially the last two years with all of the Spring signings. I never understood what he was thinking in building this program.
It has never once been explained why it was a good idea to play senior walk ons at the expense of freshman and sophomore scholarship players. Every year we have walked into the season with question marks in the guard court. Well that's because for some reason Mac played Petey and Haluska instead of DG most of his freshman year, and Buck, and Boozer the last two years.
I love Sean and Petey as much as the next guy, and appreciate their hard work and dedication. But what good is it to win 14 games instead of 10, and then come into the next season with all of the questions???
How many coaches in the history of D1 basketball have done this other than a scandal? I'd guess zero.
Not 100% what you are asking...but if you asking about programs that have turned it around. I would look at a team in our own conf. Mizzou. There have been major issues with that program after Stewart, but they have turned it around. Their coach had drug issues, recruiting issues, players being arrested and the whole program in turmoil because of this.
Dynamite 1st post there buddy... I do think the coaching staff makes adjustments, they just don't get executed by the players well sometimes. I realize there is blame on both sides but to say the players can't be held accountable for not executing is rediculous too. If you look at the top teams in the conference and even in the country they all have great guard play which is something we never seem to get consistently. I am sick of the DG appologists here too, he is a big reason why this team plays the way it does. It all starts with the PG and he comes up short in a lot of areas that we really can't afford to come up short in. I'd love to see what Colvin could do running the point for at least 30 minutes a game. We have little to lose with expirimenting with that at this point I think.
I disagree but thats alright.
I have no idea, but I think it is hard for a coach not to put the best possible team out there. Petey and Sean were our best option to win those years (and note that Sean didn't play much last year). It's hard to basically tell a team you know they won't win.
Not 100% what you are asking...but if you asking about programs that have turned it around. I would look at a team in our own conf. Mizzou. There have been major issues with that program after Stewart, but they have turned it around. Their coach had drug issues, recruiting issues, players being arrested and the whole program in turmoil because of this.
Randy Peterson.
It wasn't after Stewart it was that other coach---Quinn Snider. I wonder what he is doing now? Probably counting his money.
"Do you feel like you were behind the eight ball, in that respect when you took this job?"
I can't think of a better way to describe the sad state of this program ... the issue in a mid-season press conference is how deep the hole was four years ago?
Zero chance...
We're stuck in a neverending debate..and the only way out is winning.
GMac has had two major hurdles: 1) starting with 4 players and 2) WJ transferring. Some people think that's his fault - I can see that. Some people think those are bad breaks - I can see that too. But no one's mind is going to be changed.
But when we talk about other b12 teams that have had success (A&M, Mizz, KSU, etc.) one benefit those guys all had was keeping the existing talent: Turgeon is still coaching Gillespie recruits, Martin is still coaching Huggins recruits, and Mike Anderson had a 6'8" 235lb nephew transfer in, and he took JT Tiller with him from UAB. GMac decided not to bring any UNI guys with him.
From hind side, I know he wishes he would have cleaned house the first year and started from year 2. That's the only second guessing I know of.
GMac decided not to bring any UNI guys with him.
You know this how? Examples?