Jacob Park Could Be Dangerous!

1416530385-18fz1zxxbtovqjpg.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bewilderme
Park is the type of QB that needs good receivers because he is not going to get it done with his wheels. That long lean body will not hold up to taking off with the ball on a regular basis. He has a great arm and his accuracy seems to be superior to Lanning.
 
Park is the type of QB that needs good receivers because he is not going to get it done with his wheels. That long lean body will not hold up to taking off with the ball on a regular basis. He has a great arm and his accuracy seems to be superior to Lanning.

I know this is crazy, but football was played for a long time without relying on the QB to run with the football.
 
As much as I enjoy the positive attitude around here the past 24 hours...

...let's not overreact too far. This program has a long way to go and plenty of greater challenges to face than San Jose St. before we're where we reasonably want ourselves to be.
 
Park is the type of QB that needs good receivers because he is not going to get it done with his wheels. That long lean body will not hold up to taking off with the ball on a regular basis. He has a great arm and his accuracy seems to be superior to Lanning.
That's an odd way of saying "traditional QB."
 
People are seriously underestimating Park's athleticism. He's quicker than Lanning, which is more important in the pocket than straight away speed or power.
 
People are seriously underestimating Park's athleticism. He's quicker than Lanning, which is more important in the pocket than straight away speed or power.
If I have to settle for a 35 yard run, due to a smart read of the defense, I'll take it.
 
just remember, prior to this game Park had a 43% completion rating... I'm hoping he's turned a corner and gotten his legs back under him (after all, he didn't play for a few years), but his first two games he was not shown to be a better passer than Lanning.
 
just remember, prior to this game Park had a 43% completion rating... I'm hoping he's turned a corner and gotten his legs back under him (after all, he didn't play for a few years), but his first two games he was not shown to be a better passer than Lanning.
Maybe statistically, but he clearly threw a better ball than Lanning.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron