ISU vs Big 12 3%

Coach Hoiberg is an offensive minded coach. Live by the 3, die by the 3. Defense wins championships.
He is offensive minded because of the NBA influence he has, and that is what he brings. Just need another Doc or get the Monstars to steal Babbs defensive skills and distribute it among the whole team!
 
Last edited:
I don't have time to do the research, but I'm assuming that the numbers in the B12% column including all conference games, including Iowa State. Meaning that if you instead separated this into two columns - 3pt% vs. Iowa State and 3pt% vs. Other (non-ISU) Big 12 teams, the gap would be even bigger.

TLDR: ISU's opponents' 3pt% is probably actually even better against their average than what this chart shows.
yeah I'm not going to take time to do that someone else can have a go at it
 
We aren't good on defense compared to a lot of other teams... But one of the cornerstones of Fred's defensive strategy is to force opponents to take low percentage shots. Technically, that means leaving open someone on the three point line occasionally.

The unfortunate thing is, more often than not the person we leave open has been knocking that shot down this year.
 
This is how 3 seeds lose to 14's. If we get a team that relies on threes, with our defense, it could be an embarrassing first weekend.
 
Coach Hoiberg is an offensive minded coach. Live by the 3, die by the 3. Defense wins championships.

Wow. This comment is awful. We tried to attack the inside the whole game against Baylor and that would have won us the game if we played 3 point defense.
 
That is some BAD math. 6 out of 15 games have been over 40% (saying 40%+ is "damn near 50%" is a stretch). 5 out of 15 have shot 33% or worse.

This. 5 times teams have shot >10% above average against us. The other 10 times they have shot average or below average. A game is such a small sample size too where one extra 3 pt basket can drastically change the %.

Also, how do some of the other teams around us compare (like OU)?

That said, its clear we don't put enough emphasis on defending the perimeter.
 
I get that this is largely due to poor 3 point defense. Seemed last night we were trying to shut down Gathers & dare them to hit from deep. Unfortunately, they did. But I do remember 1 instance of Hogue being right in Cherry's face, yet he still drained the trey..

I doubt that was the only well defended 3 they made last night. What else can we expect in that particular situation? It's not like they can straight up block every one..
 
I find it weird that everyone around here buys into isu's 3's and lay ups offense, and then some of the same people say defensively allowing 3's makes sense.

Baylor rebounds, but doesn't have the post scoring to warrant conceding 3's to that extent.
 
I find it weird that everyone around here buys into isu's 3's and lay ups offense, and then some of the same people say defensively allowing 3's makes sense.

Baylor rebounds, but doesn't have the post scoring to warrant conceding 3's to that extent.
Especially when Gathers is on the bench, which he was for the majority of the 2nd half barrage.
 
I was going to say 'I miss Doc Sadler' but I honestly don't know if we were better or worse with him. I'm assuming worse without him just going by the eye test. Anyone have the stats on that?
 
I was going to say 'I miss Doc Sadler' but I honestly don't know if we were better or worse with him. I'm assuming worse without him just going by the eye test. Anyone have the stats on that?

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency (adjusted for strength of schedule), via KenPom:

2013-2014 ISU - 99.9 points allowed per 100 possession, 72nd nationally
2014-2015 ISU - 98.2 points allowed per 100 possessions, 94th nationally

Non-adjusted defensive efficiency, via BBState:

2013-2014 ISU - 100 points allowed per 100 possessions, t-101 nationally
2014-2015 ISU - 97 points allowed per 100 possessions, t-106 nationally

So, basically the same as last year. Stats have been slightly better this year, but they've seemingly been better for everyone, so the rank among all teams hasn't improved.
 
Last edited:
My first impression is that our lack of size leads us to double-team players in the paint which in turn leaves someone open.
 
The question is will Fred address this by changing defenses once in a while or will he just expect these guys to learn to play defense over night. I wish he would at least get McKay to stop leaving his man every time to block a shot leaving his man for easy put backs.
 
Adjusted Defensive Efficiency (adjusted for strength of schedule), via KenPom:

2013-2014 ISU - 99.9 points allowed per 100 possession, 72nd nationally
2014-2015 ISU - 98.2 points allowed per 100 possessions, 94th nationally

Non-adjusted defensive efficiency, via BBState:

2013-2014 ISU - 100 points allowed per 100 possessions, t-101 nationally
2014-2015 ISU - 97 points allowed per 100 possessions, t-106 nationally

So, basically the same as last year. Stats have been slightly better this year, but they've seemingly been better for everyone, so the rank among all teams hasn't improved.

AdjD is better across the board this year since the NCAA went away from the rule changes that were made for last year.
 
This is how 3 seeds lose to 14's. If we get a team that relies on threes, with our defense, it could be an embarrassing first weekend.

Perhaps, but if that team shoots 3s because they have too (I'd expect a 14 isn't strong both inside and outside) wed probably not have trouble down low and be able to stay with them better from outside. I hope anyway
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron