It's low hanging fruit as location data from outside of the athletic facilities wouldn't trigger suspicion. That's kinda the whole point of the geofencing. The likelihood of people being in that designated area that are prohibited from placing wagers is extremely high. Had every one of these athletes who were using manipulated information done 100% of their wagering outside of the geofenced areas, their chances of being detected would have gone down considerably.
Several months back, I read a SPECULATION that someone had a personal vendetta against one individual and they included both schools and all the athletes to disguise their personal attack against their target. A, see I wasn't going after this person specifically, but since they were involved, we have to include them in our investigation, type of attack.Can't help but wonder if someone at the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (where the data was viewed before the DCI asked for it) had a vendetta, bug in their craw, etc. against an athlete, group of athletes, or just athletes in general?
Some paper-pusher who couldn't make the varsity team at West Sioux???
Lol. Right there with you. That’s why I warned everybody. And I’m square in the “They knew the rules” camp.
Don't like KF but he was right to stand up for him. Maybe our coaches should have done the same. Not exactly like athletes were throwing games...You could investigate any program in the country and you would find some small time gambling taking place.
We can say "what if" all day long and it will not change anything, but you do have a great point.
