A win definitely gives us room to breathe, especially if we slip in Austin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, between must-win, bubble team, and several other terms, everyone seems to have a different definition so we often sit here and yell at each other when we actually believe the same things. God bless the internet.I get it, and it would feel so much better to win this, but I hate the words "Must Win". So what does a must-win loss imply? It almost implies that 'if' we would lose to WV, we can't get hot and go on a good run to finish the conference games out. So it would be like having little faith that our team could make much out of their season. So I will say, no. Not a must win. But a sorely needed one!
I was looking at their predictions, and have Iowa St 40% to win vs WVU, but like 55% to win vs Baylor. Personally, I would have them flipped.
Which does make the WVU game very important. If they lose, Baylor and/or a conf tournament game is must win.
Bottom line, we need to get to 18 wins, however that's possible. And when then, we'll probably be sweating on selection Sunday.
Probably, but I'd rather go into Selection Sunday with a win over a high profile opponent or two. Getting a W at KU or WVU is going to be extremely difficult, so if they're going to get any of the four you mentioned above this is probably their best shot. Not a must win, but definitely a big opportunity.
I think WVU is better than Baylor.
This site marks...
http://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/conferences/big-12/2017.html
WVU a 27 point favorite over the average D-1 team
Baylor only a 22 point favorite over " "
Yes, there are a lot of bad D-1 teams out there.
ISU would be a 19 point favorite by the same metric.
27 - 22 = WVU a five-point favorite over Baylor on a neutral court
SRS looks at point differential, not W-L. WVU has a ton of blowout wins and four close loses against relatively good programs (Temple, Texas Tech, KSU, OU... any and all Big 12 teams this year are quality opponents) while Baylor keeps squeaking by and got throttled by WVU in the head-to-head. Teams with a lot of close loses are typically better than their record.*
*much the reason SRS likes ISU, too, and why KenPom and Sagarin do given that ISU has a weak W-L record but lots of "good" and close loses to round us out
KenPom has WVU #5 and Baylor #7.
Sagarin has WVU #1 (and yes, #1 in the nation) and Baylor #11.
I feel a whole lot better about the Baylor game -- we can play with these guys. We have proven it. We were one possession away from nipping a game from them in Waco. I have a bad feeling about WVU being a terrible match up for us. If they play like the WVU of the past two years, that size, pressure, and, well, violence is not going to treat us nicely.
Considering we will likely lose at KU and at UT. It is a must win.
I generally use the eye test. I just don't see much basketball talent on WVU's team. Don't get me wrong, WVU can beat anyone with their style at home, but if Baylor guards are playing well, they're a dangerous team against anyone in the country.
No, but a loss turns other games into must wins.
I agree with you; Baylor is likely a more talented team.
We all know Scott Drew, though -- recruits like a demon, but underachieves relative to talent.
Huggy, love him or hate him, just manufactures teams, even if there are not many guys winning individual honors or making you think, "Sure wish we had him."
Like I said, neutral court, I'm taking WVU straight up.