Future Big 12 FB Opponents/Schedule Announced

Hate to break it to you but we are considered small games to pretty much everyone on our schedule.
buy this guy a beer, ladies and gentlemen we love ISU football no doubt about it, but we are what we are, last couple of years some of you all treat us like we are a down south team with rich tradition, but NO ONE ELSE sees it that way, wouldnt miss an ISU game, donate largely every year but we are what we are
 
What's so weird is that every team in every other single major sport has at least one team they play every year, no matter what.

We currently have that with Iowa, but that series is only as strong as a contract allows it to be. With both AD's changing over in this decade (likely), we could lose that as a yearly game as well.

Conferences have a way to bake that in to their model. It is odd that the Big 12 is the only conference that didn't find it necessary.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: PickSix
I am hoping by 2027 the schedules will shift a bit and we will see KSU as a permanent rival. I do like how 2024 sets up for ISU. Good thins can happen next season if this young team stays together.
 
Next year's Big 12 schedule using this year's computer composite:
#60 Tech
#91 Baylor
#14 KSU
#101 Cincy
#74 UCF
#18 Utah
#83 Houston
#24 KU
#41 WVU
Average: 56.2

The old 10 team round robin Big 12 schedule using this year's computer composite:
#4 Texas
#10 OU
#14 KSU
#24 KU
#26 OKSt
#41 WVU
#43 TCU
#60 Tech
#91 Baylor
Average: 34.7 (that's in the Big 12's most down year in over a decade)


Bring on the WINS!!!! Thrilled to be done with typical 3rd to 15th ranked SOS at end of these sesasons. Our ten year average has been 11th SOS. Give me some 40ish and 50ish ranked schedules!
 


Because the conference has such a large footprint and so many new members, it’s understandable why the Big 12 chose to limit the permanent annual rivalry games. It allows scheduling flexibility so that every team in the conference can see each other regularly. But the rivalries the Big 12 preserved are important. They’re all in-state rivalries, giving the Big 12 a dose of the regionality and proximity that makes college football special.

BYU and Utah, the Holy War, is the oldest of the group (started in 1896) and is as intense as it gets. The Territorial Cup between Arizona and Arizona State started in 1899 and has been played 96 times. The Sunflower Showdown between Kansas and Kansas State dates back to 1898 and will have its 121st meeting this year. And The Revivalry, which started in 1899 between Baylor and TCU, will have its 119th meeting this month.
 


Because the conference has such a large footprint and so many new members, it’s understandable why the Big 12 chose to limit the permanent annual rivalry games. It allows scheduling flexibility so that every team in the conference can see each other regularly. But the rivalries the Big 12 preserved are important. They’re all in-state rivalries, giving the Big 12 a dose of the regionality and proximity that makes college football special.

BYU and Utah, the Holy War, is the oldest of the group (started in 1896) and is as intense as it gets. The Territorial Cup between Arizona and Arizona State started in 1899 and has been played 96 times. The Sunflower Showdown between Kansas and Kansas State dates back to 1898 and will have its 121st meeting this year. And The Revivalry, which started in 1899 between Baylor and TCU, will have its 119th meeting this month.

The contradiction is, left to their own devices, BYU and Utah had been passionate about not playing each other and not wanting to be in the same conference.

I agree it's a true hated rivalry and a great story...but it is the one angle where you can look that ISU and KSU probably actually want to play that game, Utah was screaming "WE DON'T EVER WANT BYU". I'm also not sold that Baylor/TCU is bigger than any number of old Big 8 matchups. If they have a trophy I have no idea what it is, I know what the Apple Cup and the Platypus trophies look like (two now extinct in state rivalries).

Still at the end of the day I want some years where the schedule allows for a gaudy win total and KSU as guaranteed rival in FB doesn't help with that.
 
The "don't care" people seem to be reacting every bit as strongly to the people who "do care" we won't be playing K-State. Newtons 3rd law is alive and well on CF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awd4cy
What's so weird is that every team in every other single major sport has at least one team they play every year, no matter what.

We currently have that with Iowa, but that series is only as strong as a contract allows it to be. With both AD's changing over in this decade (likely), we could lose that as a yearly game as well.

Conferences have a way to bake that in to their model. It is odd that the Big 12 is the only conference that didn't find it necessary.

NFL teams don't all play and our conferences are heading for 22ish teams to their 32. They even play some teams twice to play others zero.

Some of you who aren't familiar would loooooooove how European soccer works. Most leagues around 20 teams, identical home and away 38 game schedule for all. Top teams gain entry into Champions League/Europa Cup (all of europe tournament and like an NIT, both the next year), bottom teams relegated to effectively AAA baseball and have to earn way back in.

Our football and basketball schedules during the previous 10 team era really did remind me a lot of the good parts of european soccer leagues but without promotion/relegation. The end result in football though combined with the annual game vs Iowa was schedules that are just harder than a program like ISU ever needed, our program didn't need a top 10 schedule so often and it took a toll some years. In basketball we could hang with it, in fb it has been a challenge.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron