Matt Thomas should study Klay Thompson. He really compares to him. Monte should study CP3. He really compares to him. Talen should study Kawhi Leonard. He compares to him.
Eli chooses, Fran loses
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
There’s a whole other line you forgot to read. When I saw compare, it’s a loose comparison. Like Jokic, Luka isn’t super athletic but he has great inside game and can stretch out. I also said Luka likely won’t be much in the NBA.
Are you sure? It appears that they worry more about teams that were winless in their conference.
Having passing ability and vision like Jokic is something a player is born with. You can’t just adopt that skill, which is why a Jokic and Garza comparison makes no sense.
Iowa Swarm Lounge: Iowa Hawkeyes Football Message Board
The home for inside scoop on Hawkeye sports, including football, basketball, baseball, and softball.
Iowa Swarm Lounge: Iowa Hawkeyes Football Message Board
The home for inside scoop on Hawkeye sports, including football, basketball, baseball, and softball.
Seriously get some help @ClockHawk69 this is getting sad
Oddly enough Ayo is projected to be a late 1st round NBA pick while most mock drafts I have seen do not have Garza in it. If this was 20 years ago Garza probably goes in the lottery
20 years ago, Luka might be going number 1 overall. It’s just the way the game adapts and changes.
Kevin McHale is a good Garza comp. I think would have been a force in the 80's and early 90's.
50 years ago, Luka might have been the under study for Lurch in the Addams Family.
I've seen fence posts with more athleticism than Garza. @CyTwins is this a retreat or new idiot?
Jokic might be a bottom 3rd athlete in the NBA. He is still 10x the athlete that Luka is. Sorry.
Lukas ceiling in the NBA is Georges Niang. That is far more a compliment to Luka than it is a slight to Georges.
IDK. He would've had a better chance to stick i think, but a force might be a stretch.
