According to Merriam Webster the synonyms are:
There are more. But thanks for adding value.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Merriam Webster the synonyms are:
Are you sure you are immune?
Even the Moderna and Pfizer shots are only 90% effective. The J&J in the 70%'s.
So my understanding is people who refuse to get vaccine increase chance for those vaccinated who don't have immunity to get Covid.
I have rcvd Covid shot, but if a of going to ISU football or basketball games this fall is still a scary prospect. Not so much for me, but for older family members I interact with.
I would have no issue with proof of vaccination being required to attend large gatherings like sporting events, concerts, etc.
Covid aside, I really enjoyed the partial crowds at Iowa State games last year that I attended (Texas Tech, @ Kansas and West Virginia). I love going to games in person, being outside, etc., and the partial football crowds were fine by me. I was masked and felt safe. Not sure how safe I will feel with a full crowd, even masked and vaxxed.
I wish I could have your approach... sometimes I just feel like I’m missing out if I’m not right in the mix of everything (nothing ever happens BTW).
That’s cool on your end. I’d like it some days!
"Nothing wrong with this..." Just who the **** do you think you are? You think he needs your approval? Or what if he wanted.to avoid crowds for a reason you consider "wrong"? Get over yourself, asshat.Nothing wrong with this... but is that for every day life... Sporting Events, Church, Stores, Concerts, Fairs, Farmers Markets, etc.??
Those words don't fit this asshat's narrative, silly.According to Merriam Webster the synonyms are:
"Nothing wrong with this..." Just who the **** do you think you are? You think he needs your approval? Or what if he wanted.to avoid crowds for a reason you consider "wrong"? Get over yourself, asshat.
The question is fine. But you sure as hell dont need him to tell you whether your reason is ok. i dont think you wanted that from him, did you?It's a legit question. Those are typical things people do.
I get weird looks when I say I enjoy social distancing after they realize I'm not kidding.
The question is fine. But you sure as hell dont need him to tell you whether your reason is ok. i dont think you wanted that from him, did you?
I don't believe it is for me to tell you how you should take it.I didn't but I also didn't really take it that way I guess.
Should I have?
I didn't but I also didn't really take it that way I guess.
Should I have?
The problem is, that’s only a 90% immunity. So what some genius doesn’t do can still affect us.
To answer (part of) the original question, I think I saw something about ISU arranging a mass vaccination for students shortly on campus.
I would assume athletes are strongly motivated to attend.
Breakthrough cases are at something like 0.008% for vaccinated people. I'm not smart enough to explain that. My wife is, but I'm not smart enough to interpret to engineer level intelligence.
Bottom line, you got your shot, you're in the clear.
The lights are still on. Clearly it can’t be sinking then.
I'd love it if 100% of people were vaccinated but that's obviously not going to happen. A certain segment of the population has been brainwashed to think it contains microchips or its "dangerous" while they smoke a pack a day and do other dangerous activities.Are you sure you are immune?
Even the Moderna and Pfizer shots are only 90% effective. The J&J in the 70%'s.
So my understanding is people who refuse to get vaccine increase chance for those vaccinated who don't have immunity to get Covid.
I have rcvd Covid shot, but the thought of going to ISU football or basketball games this fall is still a scary prospect. Not so much for me, but for older family members I interact with.
I would have no issue with proof of vaccination being required to attend large gatherings like sporting events, concerts, etc.
Hmmm. I've watched this closely since its inception. A couple of things concerned me from the start.
First, the erratic messages by the CDC and WHO. They flip flopped so often I started to not know what to believe. Even today, perusing the CDC site, it's amazing how many non definitive verbs are used (eg could, can, may, maybe) vs definite (will).
Then, there's this simple fact that in 1 year we came up with a novel vaccine for a disease which can't officially be classified as a virus because it can't be modeled as such. Even then, we can come up with an RNA based treatment in 1 year, but for some reason can't make better progress on cancer in over 50. Interesting.
Then there's the reason of why are tests only 90% accurate? Looking into that bares the bones of this whole thing. And, then the 'radical' adjustment (significantly lowering the amplification rate) to the test by the WHO after Biden was elected. I welcome anyone disproving that because, very honestly, all I'm seeking is the truth. That lower amplification rate, coincidently timed around the increase of the vaccination, dramatically alters ALL statistics. For if this level were 'before' the vaccine, we wouldn't have been scared by the sheer numbers. But, since it's after, it's absolutely wonderful how well the vaccine is doing (sarcasm).
And, then there's this: the vaccine prevents you from getting sick, but does not prevent you from contracting the disease. And since that's the case, why are we allowing masks to come off?
Ok, all that aside, I do NOT blame anyone for taking the vaccine. After all, per government influence it's the only way to get back to normal. Like it or not, I understand that's where we are at. And people have a right to do with their bodies what they'd like.
Be very clear. I'm NOT a conspiracy type of person. But, there are way too many questions to start forcing a vaccine into people who are patiently waiting for more definitive (see 'testing' ambiguity above for measure of 'definitive') results.