Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

Coaches named in ISU release

ISU did exactly what they were supposed to when they found out there was a problem? Now I am worried. With the NCAA no good deed goes unpunished.
 
CynadoAlley said:
With the bad luck we've had this year, and the fact that we're not necessarily a big boy, I have to admit I'm a little worried the NCAA tries to set an example. But it seems like we've seen way worse things than this happen across the NCAA for less consequences.

The pessimist in me is worried, but the realist in me says it can't be that bad.
Click to expand...
Set what example? That a school is better off to not try to do any sort internal policing because the NCAA will nail them to the wall with whatever they report? Even with as stupid as the NCAA is sometimes, why would they go that route? A light-to-reasonable set of punishments would do the most long-term good for the NCAA.
 
mtowncyclone13 said:
that's weird, i can't find keith moore in the state salary database from 2006-2011? shouldn't he be in there is he was an ISU employee?
Click to expand...

I don't trust that database. I've been a grad student since January 2010, and I don't show up there. I do show up as "casual hourly" in 2006/2007 when I was an undergrad, but I was also a casual hourly employee as an undergrad in 2008/2009.

The database seems as well put-together as their ISU athletics coverage.
 
mtowncyclone13 said:
that's weird, i can't find keith moore in the state salary database from 2006-2011? shouldn't he be in there is he was an ISU employee?
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly he was back finishing his undergrad degree he didn't finish as a player and was more of a voluntary coach?
 
MNCyGuy said:
Set what example? That a school is better off to not try to do any sort internal policing because the NCAA will nail them to the wall with whatever they report? Even with as stupid as the NCAA is sometimes, why would they go that route? A light-to-reasonable set of punishments would do the most long-term good for the NCAA.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with you. I just generally don't tie common-sense together with the NCAA.
 
Sampson had about 500 calls at OU and about 100 at Indiana.

How many did we have?

I think Sampson lied in the the info he supplied the NCAA at IU, which was a bigger problem.
 
How can this be a major infraction. This is minor and the amount is minor compaired to the other stuff that goes on in the NCAA. The NCAA has a pattern set when dealing with stuff like this and no real major punsishments come of it.
 
MNCyGuy said:
Set what example? That a school is better off to not try to do any sort internal policing because the NCAA will nail them to the wall with whatever they report? Even with as stupid as the NCAA is sometimes, why would they go that route? A light-to-reasonable set of punishments would do the most long-term good for the NCAA.
Click to expand...

It wouldnt actually be much of an example to the schools themselves. It would, however, be an opportunity for the NCAA to tout that its successfully enforcing its rules. More of a chance to look like it is setting an example for the schools.
 
here's the thing....I don't think major NCAA violations means what the newspaper wants you to believe. When we hear major we think bowl bans and post season bans and scholarship reductions. When the NCAA hears major violations of this sort, they think 'eh'.
 
I can only assume that everyone is going to be fired. From the president, all the way down to the janitors.
 
We reported 79 calls. That's less than Sampson had at OU and IU.

Doesn't seem like a big deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom