I would buy what he is saying if the team at the end of last year didn't look worse than the team at the beginning of the year. Maybe we are better off than we think and all those freshman will be great in their soph year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. He's using it this year. We burned Bates' redshirt for a 3-9 team and the only thing he really did was make that catch against Iowa.
He did not leave the program in better shape, that is just a flat out lie! The only thing he *might* have done is brought in better overall talent, but with 1 1/2 recruiting classes, he really can't back that up either. We still have a lot of guys on the roster that are from Mac's last couple recruiting classes.
I wanted a change after 2006 just like the majority of ISU fans, but to have such a huge ego and amount of arrogance as Eugene does to say he left the program in better shape is just plain bullship!
I can't wait to watch him fall on his face and get run out of town as fast as he bailed on us. Stupid redneck *****!
"I have no question in my mind that we were definitely on the right track," Chizik said. "Last year, we played with a brand-new quarterback and 11 true freshmen. We were starting a bunch of them. That's hard to do in that league. There's no question we were going to win a lot of games in Years 3 and 4, which was our plan all along. We did it right from the time we walked in the door to the time we left. There's no doubt that place is better off now than from when we inherited it."
:skeptical:
I don't get it. I don't see where Chizik is being arrogant. Quite the opposite. In some ways I agree with him -- 11 freshmen starters and a new quarterback and all.
I guess I could have done without the "left it better than I found it" comment, but isn't that why many of us wanted the football program to go in a different direction? The program under McCarney the last couple of years was spiriling downward.
Of course most of those freshmen shouldn't have been playing in the first place. What was with the rotating door at RB? Playing guys early just to have them burn a year for kickoff coverage made a lot of sense too (three of those guys are gone now by the way). I say he is overconfident in his abilities and the job he did here and that could be construed as arrogant. He pretty much had a bell curve of success at ISU. Sucked beyond belief to start and end his career at ISU with a tiny peak of success (some of it due as much to mismanagement by CU as anything we did) in the middle.
The next time you post, don't hold anything back, ribsnwhiskey. Tell us how you really feel.:wink:
I'm looking forward to seeing if it was our "lack of talent" that couldn't get a play in from the sideliens on time...
EDIT: I am hoping we have more talent in that "position" this year... :biggrin:
It's been a tough year to be a Cyclone! :sad:
Plus, and I know it would never get back to them, but I want some of these weasels who do the things they do to know how real people feel about them. I'd like nothing more than to look Geno straight in the eye and tell him what I think of him.
If Chizik was truly building for the future, then he would have redshirt all 11 of those true freshmen. He contradicts himself right there. Plus, he left a lot more holes on our defensive line and at LB than he inherited. Remember that he inherited guys like Kurtis Taylor, Ahtyba Rubin, Ace Bowen, Michael Bibbs and Jon Banks. And almost all of our current projected starters on the Front 7 were recruited by McCarney (Parker, Frere, Alburtis, Garrin, Raven, Schmidgall). Other than Jerrod Black and Roosevelt Maggit, he left behind very few players in that area for Coach Rhoads to work with.
I have a good feeling he may use some words that I have never heard of... :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:
I'd pay good money to watch you do that.
No kidding. If we fall on our faces the next 2 years, then he'll brush it off and say he wasn't around to make it work. What a d*ck.
You won't have to "hope" he gets worked by Saban and Alabama. Saban may be one of the best coaches in the country and Chizik is absolutely no match.[/QUOTE]
This is where the "he HAD to take the big money" excuse comes in. I think eventually Gene would've turned things around here all the while preparing himself for that SEC/B12S job he really wanted.
By leaving so early Gene robbed himself of some valuable HEAD coaching experience that he obviously needs badly. Not only is he outmatched by Saban, I would say he's outmatched by almost every other SEC coach. I think the Iron Bowl is going to be a bloodbath this year and Auburn will be lucky to get to .500. If that persists into the 2010 season I think he's done after his second loss to Bama.
The bad news for us is that Auburn calls one Paul Rhoads after he's taken ISU to consecutive B12 championship games. :wink:
No kidding. If we fall on our faces the next 2 years, then he'll brush it off and say he wasn't around to make it work. What a d*ck.
You won't have to "hope" he gets worked by Saban and Alabama. Saban may be one of the best coaches in the country and Chizik is absolutely no match.[/QUOTE]
This is where the "he HAD to take the big money" excuse comes in. I think eventually Gene would've turned things around here all the while preparing himself for that SEC/B12S job he really wanted.
By leaving so early Gene robbed himself of some valuable HEAD coaching experience that he obviously needs badly. Not only is he outmatched by Saban, I would say he's outmatched by almost every other SEC coach. I think the Iron Bowl is going to be a bloodbath this year and Auburn will be lucky to get to .500. If that persists into the 2010 season I think he's done after his second loss to Bama.
The bad news for us is that Auburn calls one Paul Rhoads after he's taken ISU to consecutive B12 championship games. :wink:
And CPR kindly says "No frickin' way" because he's got all the integrity and trust that cheesedik claims to have but actually doesn't.