I suppose it doesn't matter much, I just want to have my facts straight.
According to this article from last winter, ISU' office of Judicial affairs said he violated the code. The Admin law judge found that unfounded. It was then appealed to Leath, the BOR backed it and the district court gave the stay.
So it wasn't initially Leath - although probably acting on his instruction (mostly).
I guess I'm just saying that it isn't Leath alone making this decision, despite how much people want to crucify him for it.
I'm curious how the Admin judge - who by my reading was between the OJA and Leath, could make a "finding", but then it could be appealed to Leath.
Still - I don't really get what is going to be accomplished in the end.
Edit: Ok, thanks for the link KC. This is about a setup for his civil suit against the accuser. In the end, I just hope that the correct decisions are made and justice is done.