If you aren't going to send the crew to the location, why not just use Scott and Blum again? I like the TV team a lot obviously but you can't tell me they don't do better than a team not on location.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm too naive to know exactly what it would take to do this but if you don't have the crew in house, can't you dedicate someone on the tech side to make a bigger effort to keep relevant stats displayed? I think id rather have a running banner with points, fouls, etc.. with no audio than two guys at home shooting the breeze.
Now that we're a legit top 25 team and nobody can really call us a fluke anymore, any chance we get promoted from having so many of our games on ESPN+ the rest of the season?
I've never understood it because flying the talent in is one of the least expensive parts of the broadcast. You're still trucking equipment in from somewhere and paying 12-15 people anyway between camera guys, techs and a producer/director.
Well and in all actuality, how much is the cost savings in doing this? Seems like some real nickel and dime from the worldwide leader.I can't stand when ESPN does that. If you don't want to send people, put the game on ESPN+.
If the game is going to be on ESPN/ESPN2/ESPNU they need to actually send them to the game. It's so dumb.
The production is horrible.
I would recommend Varsity app for audio. You get John and Heft for everything. Not sure how bad the delay is, but I've enjoyed it very much.If you aren't going to send the crew to the location, why not just use Scott and Blum again? I like the TV team a lot obviously but you can't tell me they don't do better than a team not on location.
I've never understood it because flying the talent in is one of the least expensive parts of the broadcast. You're still trucking equipment in from somewhere and paying 12-15 people anyway between camera guys, techs and a producer/director.