So if your secondary sucks you can just say blown coverage? Interesting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed...so....I'm not sure ISU looked dominant minus blown coverages.
We had 100 more yards them, offense was not a push. Our defense didn’t give up a single touchdown. We just can’t figure out how to put the ball in the end zone consistently right now. To me I think we should give a shot to Pettway over the middle every time we’re in the red zone the dude is a freak. We don’t have that guy that’s going to high point a fade in the corner of the end zone like Hakeem and Allen. I was really hoping Sean Shaw would emerge being 6’6 but obviously he isn’t doing something right since he’s getting 0 playing time.Disagree. The two offenses were a push. The two defenses were a push. Special teams decided this game.
We tried the same prevent defense EVERY third down. Maybe we should have tried something different one time just to see whether it might have worked. ON the few times we blitzed, we almost always disrupted the play.Iowa’s 3rd down conversion % was insane. Defense struggled to get off the field. Not elite tonight. A sustained drive by the offense when it was 14-6 would have been huge. Not ready to praise our O line for a sub 100 yard game rushing. Tip your hat to Iowa and move on. Not sure about this team. We’ll see.
It was beyond good. 3 yds or 20 yds, no matter.ISU outgained Iowa by a large margin. Iowa's 3rd down conversion rate was good, but overall their offensive was unimpressive.